The chosenites probably did realize that they could be marked and excluded/torched by having their genitals mutilated and eventually managed to convince most of their herd of American goy to do the same thing by buying of 'Christian' preachers, having their 'medical experts' teach their bullshit about 'penis cancer', and so on.  Kinda reached peak mutilation my gen-x time, but my dad was having none of it, thank God.  Now I don't have to buy their big pharma boner pills and what-not just to be able to get it up.  Thanks Dad!

But yeah, between having some scary old herped-to-the-max creep chewing half your dick off as an infant, going to some kooky yeshiva to dry-hump the shekinah while you study about your chosenness, etc, etc, it's really not terribly surprising that we get freaks like frankist1 on these boards.  And 80% of the Israeli population thinking it is A-OK to genocide the Palastinians, with 50% of them thinking it is OK to do it by simply murdering them in cold blood.

I must sadly concede that these current Israelians, and people who were damaged in the same manner in many of the Jewish enclaves 'scattered among the nations', are largely beyond any realistic hope.  Physical 'Israel' _must_ survive in order that these Chosen-by-Satanites have a place to be where they pose less of a threat to normal people.  Gotta get the nukes out of their hands first though.

Iran should require two very reasonable things with world-wide support:

 1) Iran and Israel both denuclearize down to zero at the same time and submit to inspections by a provably dis-interested regulatory body (the IAEA being a sick joke at this point.)  This is easy for Iran because they their nuclearlization was primarily an artifact of Israelian sponsored propaganda with no demonstrable basis in reality.

 2) An equitable two-state solution for the Palestinians.

Until both conditions are met, I would suggest to just keep on with nightly missile attacks and targeted assassinations-in-kind to sink both Israel and anyone stupid/evil enough to 'stand with Israel'.

A smart move on Iran's part would be to _respond_ to anything by anybody with strikes specifically on Israel.  Most of the rest of the civilized world would cheer every strike since Israel is so hated due to their Gaza genocide and other things.  Even the U.S. at the street level since more and more people are waking up and becoming resentful that Israel controls the U.S..

The idea would be to keep the enemy on alert and under strain for an extended period of time.  Hopefully this will ultimately lead to depletion of resources, the collapse of political leaderships, and economic collapse.

Once Israel-targeted responses became the norm for the U.S., 'collective West', and associated Israel-controlled gulf states to expect missiles to target semi-random things in Israel, they would let down their guards making effective strikes against them more practical.

One of the main reasons that the U.S. attacked was that they need an excuse for their own upcoming economic collapse.  They hope to blame it on high energy prices caused by Iran.  Ergo, it is best for Iran to avoid becoming a scapegoat by blanket targeting of energy.  At least for now.

A really positive outcome of this war would be regime change in Israel, and it doesn't seem far-fetched.

Even on Bitchute I saw a flash of a vid about civil disobedience in Israel against the Netansatan (Gift from Satan) government and their suicidal death-wishes, but it vanished very quickly.  Clearly it is a VERY high sensitivity issue in zionaziland and managed with much higher priority than even the destruction of Tel Aviv.

At this point it looks like the best hope Israel has is just to capitulate.  They may have simply fucked up to badly and the situation is not salvageable for them.  And enough Israelis will understand this.  With sane leadership, the surrender of Israel could strip them of their nukes which would let the whole world breath easier, and also the settlement of the Palestinian genocide with a genuine two-state solution.

Hopefully the real-estate clock would be rolled back past the mistake where the U.N. gave 1/3 of the population 2/3 of the land and thus created the conditions for psychopathic genocide we have seen this year in Gaza.  I know from my reading of historical documents that well before the foundation of the state of Israel, informed planners were well aware of the psychopathy of the Zionists and religious freaks.  That's why they put Jerusalem in Jordanian hands.

Israel is reporting, going into the 7th night, that 24 citizens have been killed.  Seems like Iran is really treating the Israeli civilians with kid gloves, kind and merciful people that they are.  Pinpoint accuracy is 40+ year old tech at this point.  You think that someone can build a missile that does mach-11 and cannot achieve accuracy?  Doesn't stand to reason since accuracy enhances military effectiveness by a very large factor.

You do believe the Israeli's 24 dead number, right?  I mean it's not like they would lie about anything.

Looks like the East European block-on-forehead leather-arm-strapers are leveraging their human/organ trafficking networks and chabad houses to get the hell out of Dodge while the (disappointingly few) half-way decent Israelians are being left behind as burnt offerings.  I mean, who could have seen that coming...other than those of us who researched why the call it the 'Babylonian' talmud, kabbalah, protocols of the learned elders of zion, general history, etc.

Interestingly, Iranians are on the whole quite a bit more intelligent than Israelis, not to mention a lot more mentally tough.

  https://www.thecaliforniacourier.com/average-iq-by-country-2025-update/

This helps explain why Iran chose a much smarter strategy of creating and building in volume weapons which do not require high degrees of technical support on an ongoing basis as do aircraft, and instead developed missiles which outclassed the enemies' defensive systems and safely (and cheaply) stockpiled them.

Well I'll be go'd' to hell; looks like hazelnuts grow in Iran too!  Or, this is a fake vid.

I was going to suggest that for every GBU-57A/B the U.S. 'supplies to Israel', Russia matches with an Oreshnik.  No need.  Indeed, seems possible that the flow is reversed and Iran supplies them to Russia?  A practical advantage of the Oreshik is that one need not supply a $1,000,000,000 strategic bomber along with the bomb.  Handy.

  Iran launched new ballistic missiles towards Israel
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/7uTfA1aGFCvX

Iversen makes a pretty interesting observation about the 'lost tribes' and what is seemingly a better match with the biblical texts.

The so-called 'end of days' which are being conjured up could contain a rude awakening for the 'flock' shepherded over by so-called 'Christian leadership' in various parts of the 'collective West.'

From my perspective, this sheds some light on how the 'Christians' could be so 'given over to a reprobate mind' that they support and participate in the truly demonic Israeli activities in Gaza.

  Evangelicals Are CHEERING ON War With Iran The Prophecy Of Gog and Magog
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/TA0yCmLIlXoO

Even as Israel holds American human shields hoping that their demise will rope America even more into their messianic fever-dream, United States of Israel politicians fall over themselves on social media to prove their dedication to their true owners.  Disgusting.

  Israel BLOCKS ESCAPE, Uses US Citizens As HUMAN SHIELDS
  https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ca9yy2aOQSbA

Nice to have if someone else is paying for it.  Namely, American taxpayers 'represented' by Israeli-controlled pervs.

Someday people will figure out that these overpriced Western 'defense' systems are nothing but a money-making scam.  The people who are making the money have their own personal 'defense' strategies.  e.g., Gulfstream jets and villa's scattered around the planet, some of which are equipped with bunkers to sit out the initial radiation fallout.

Only semi-related, but...

To me, 'core' is strongly associated with bitcoin.org, the repo, and distributions of binaries since that is what most users probably use.

Did you guys consider simply requiring a 'manual' step for selecting a config set and distributing one as the standard which is the most well tested against to release and most widely discussed and understood by the primary contributors?  Naturally downstream package management systems would usually eliminate the 'manual' part, or make nifty menus or whatever.

Seems to me that doing this would potentially reduce somewhat the liability concerns (since people _could have_ filtered out CP or whatever attack might be at hand) but it is up to the user to choose 'their own' configs.  I suppose that instructions to edit the configs might achieve more or less the same thing.

Also, of course, it might mollify some of the community to a degree.  Without knowing too much about it, I kinda feel that it might be worth the hassle to have a relatively advanced config+lint system and encourage it to be developed and used.  Of course it complicate development and lead to a ton of user level problems and issues, but I feel that it would ultimately end up with a more robust system and one capable of rapid defenses against attacks (or conversely, lead to attacks for that matter.)

I have to say (maybe again) that issues such as these are welcome windows into the ecosystem personalities, philosophies, skill levels, cults, etc) as a whole.  I also have to say that it landed certain people who I had some confidence in a lot farther down on my list of trusted personalities.  Samson Mow for one, and the Kratter guy and the BTC sessions guy for two.  All three are relatively new to me.  All put out good and insightful information, but I don't feel that they conducted themselves very well at all here, and in some cases I have to re-think the use of some of the products they are associated with.

How long before Zelensiky orders a himars strike on the 6,000 or 12,000 Ukrainian corpses he is refusing to take from Russia so as to avoid sharing the western loot with the Ukrainian families who lost loved-ones?

It is awfully greedy of the families to use the loot for buying food now that their kidnapped men are dead when it could go to a good cause; like buying more sports cars for the poor zionazi oligarchy who were displaced to Monaco.

Chef Vlad is becoming rather well known for his world class Odessa-style cuisses de grenouilles rôties.

I doubt that Trump is 'in the Epstein files' in the way most people think of.  He's a protege of Roy Cohen and friends with a ton of other creeps like Roger Stone.  He would have known all about this operation, and he's a teetotaler, so I doubt that he would let himself get trapped by it.

No, I'll bet that Trump is 'in the Epstein files' of a different type.  Surely some agencies actually did some research on the Israeli/Zionist operation to entrap American personalities and thus gain control of the U.S. governing apparatus.  Surely such agencies would have some files.  I'll bet a dime to a donut that THESE are the files that Musk is talking about.  Such a thing (working with/for Mossad) would make Trump guilty of treason of the highest magnitude.  Trump, the guy who sent Pollard to Israel (After Obama sprung him from jail.)  Even such a sleezeball as GW Bush wouldn't do that, and he was very highly pressured.

Whatever the case it is amusing to see that EVERYONE, particularly in the media, seems swarming to Trump's defense and tripping over one another in the process over Musk's Epstein comments.

I'd say that Elon's game is to put VP Mascara in as POTUS.  That's fellow technocrat Peter Thiel's butt-boy for those who may have forgotten.

Better late than never.  If they would have targeted military objects instead of civilians they might not be losing the war so badly.  But everything they do seems to be PR focused, and assaulting civilian markets with cluster munitions plays well with 'their people' which speaks volumes about those who 'stand with Ukraine'.

Is that the same military that have, several times now, cut-n-run from a gaggle of tribesman in Yemen.  Seems like they talk the talk better than they walk the walk.

Yup, Russia took a very significant hit.  That ain't no lie.

One thing I've noted is that Russia has a strong tendency to defer on the use certain techniques until after the techniques are used against them.  Often _shortly_ after.  Cluster munitions come to mind.

Obviously Ukriods are nothing more than the tools the Western countries use against Russia.  The West has been seemingly deliberately (and by their own policies) chock full of actors who may have a grudge.  A fraction of the technical support given to Ukraine, when given to disgruntled internal entities within the Western 'democracies', could likely do manyfold comparable damage.

Gee, I guess internal security needs are incompatible with 'democracy' as it used to be known in the West.  At least within those who have, in their infinite wisdom, chosen to be belligerents.  What a bummer, eh?

I have to say that the Russian civilians who took extraordinarily risky action to stop many of the attacks have truly earned my respect.  Based on my observations of the reactions of Western civilians in the face of a need for action, such a thing would surprise me very much in most of the 'West' these days.

Yeah, 'donations' in the same way as when one is 'volenteered' for doing some task.  A friend of mine 'donated' about $1k or so before he gave up on using vendors who used Chivo's payment platform service.  Or more accurately, went crawling back to Visa/Mastercard.

I don't want to piss in anyone's cheerios, but it's not hard to understand why uptake of Bitcoin remained low.  That said, more people are more aware and more interested in the concept of a deflationary currency and self-custody.  Things may be moving under the surface, and exposure to people who have done well with the asset class year after years is mostly a positive thing.  This is even more the case as legacy banks become less and less functional and performant due to the demands that they perform monetary surveillance and enforcement roles.


4) Maintain a certain opaque element as to exactly who owns what, how and where it came from, and how and to whom it might be distributed in the event of what set of events.  Allow people to decide the answers to these questions for themselves based on what makes them feel good, and gently 'nudge' them in a favorable direction by use of social media influences.  'People' would include IMF people, although they do have their hands on the spigot.  Supposedly.

It will be a good test of NATO's article 5 when weird lava starts bubbling up out of holes from the former German Taurus fabrication facilities.

Actually, I'm sure that Putin fully understands that the West NEEDS WW-III because they are about to implode and are going to try everything they can think of to get it.  A smart move would be to 'turn the other cheek' and let the West collapse more-or-less on their own.  This is even more inevitable with the coke-head, tranny-dad-spouse-having leadership installed as 'leaders' by the WEF types who run the place.

Of course the WEF old-money types already moved their loot to Asia decades ago which is probably why they are collapsing the West.  They will end up with much more of it than they already have, and a lot fewer problematic plebs who think they should have human rights and shit, and who would have gotten old and non-productive and still need support.

Probably.

The IMF is part of a protection racket where countries are actively put into difficult states (though they don't tend to need a lot of external help for that) and offered the means to survive...for a price.  The price is often that a share of the natural resources of the country is handed over to Western corporate interests.

So, it stands to reason that there have been instances where a country avoided some problems by use of the financial 'help'.  At the same time, further enriching corrupt political interests within a country is not usually the most effective recipe for producing stable and prosperous nations as the marketing behind the racket proposes.  It is a good way to continue the need for more IMF 'loans' in the future however.

I read somewhere that deeper down, the IMF is more controlled by the American bankers where with the World Bank it tends to be more the Europeans bankers who identify the targets and do the dirty-work.