Marty sounds like he's describing himself.

What about the oil price-crash since 2014?
What about the great below-1000$ gold forecast?
What about the crash in government bonds since the ECM 2015 date?
What about the real estate crash since the same date?
What about the December 2018-crash?

Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.

Hahahaha, this is getting absolutely ridiculous.  
I know you guys won't believe it until you click the link and see it for yourselves, but yes Martin Armstrong wrote the following:  


What a gaslighter lmao.

https://www.keiserreport.com/2015/04/martin-armstrong-gold-to-max-out-at-5000-per-ounce/

https://twitter.com/maxkeiser/status/418795316364599296

https://twitter.com/maxkeiser/status/596773124844163072

https://www.keiserreport.com/2016/06/martin-armstrong-issues-warning-did-gold-just-receive-a-kiss-of-death/

looks like max keiser  listens to him as well   in the third link he tweets the forcaster is a must see. well well well

but i then again this forum thinks max keiser is fake and so is zerohedge.

YUP AS I THOUGHT DECPHIER 11 NO CHART JUST GIBBIRSH

unfortunately this forum has been taken over by a troll.you will never get an informed opinion in here its basically one guy in here wth ten fake
accounts who spams the forum with his crackpot ideas. in here the belief is that zero hedge is a fake site which pretty much should have you
reaching for your mouse to move on, but if not then read on. if you post a positive blog about martin armstrong you will instantly be accused of
actually being him. try it and see. should you hit on one of links from his many accounts you will be taken to a site which is just basically a hate site
where they nit pick at things he said to try to undermine him. every link will take you to the same site. if you read the beginning of the forum you
can see it was an informed discussion but not anymore.i suggest you move on to another forum where you will get a more balanced view.if however like me
you enjoy trolling trolls then jump on in it is at least amusing.
if you hit the ignore button on the following authors (anonymous coder,traxo, dibley8899,unwashed,s29 and trulycoined)then you will see the real contibutions
from people but unfortunately still all you will see is squabbling from people reacting to the troll which is what he wants. im just trying to get the word
out to anyone unfortunate enough to come here.here is my truth which hopefully rings true to you. hes very knowledgeable on history if you follow his general
advice eg dow going up usd going up euro going down etc then your on a winner. but but but i found socrates basically a waste of time for the average guy its
his baby let him use it don't waste your cash on it. it costs £11 $15usd for private blog per month and
that is well worth it.i will be creating a youtube channel soon so pop back and you might just get an informed viewpoint with his actual reports for you to see
and decide.i post this message a lot sorry for that but you gotta fight this government shill gold bug democrat nutter sour investor.don't know which category
he fits in maybe all four.
thanks and welcome to the loonie bin its quite a ride

Dude, that was me and I'm a registered republican, lol. If you actually read my comment you would notice it was to say that something fake supports MA. I personally do not like ZH so maybe that was a bad comparison but the point still stands. This is what I said;
 
I was actually questioning MA truthfulness on his comment. Can you enlighten me on who challenges him, besides here? Links would be nice which actually states MA by name and his forecast. As far as reading MSM the same point stands, of all the places surely the MSM would bash him the most and I haven't seen any of that. Are you part of the Maga Cult? These guys here pretty much proved their argument and I agree from personal experience. I do give MA credit for his knowledge of economic history which is verified by others I've read with the same knowledge.

the fact remains hilary will not win i feel sorry for you look at your party its a sad sad state of affairs your party will break up im afraid

the funniest thing is how somebody called zerohedge fake news that just shows how crazy these democrats are they want you to watch the mainstream media lol. i see michael bloomberg wants hilary as a running mate hmmm seems like someone said hilary would arrive on the seen.who was it damn cant remember ooh it was ma hahahahahahahahahahah

I'd like to know who these people are that challenge him, besides here. I read MSM and haven't heard them even mention MA and I also read some alt media and they haven't mention him either except one who made a reference to him. Even fake zero hedge, which I don't read but hear they promote MA. So who are these people? I know this is a limited sample but my .02.

Here he goes again:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/future-forecasts/me-v-socrates/


Well okay Marty, if you're so convinced Socrates is infallible and that your opinions are not so good (despite calling yourself "The Forecaster"), then stop posting these constant (wrong) predictions about the direction of the markets completely and let Socrates handle everything. Oh wait, that's not gonna happen will it? Nevertheless, it's already proven in this thread that Socrates is at best a horrible after-the-fact trend following program. Well at least Marty has admitted now that his opinions are almost worthless and that it would be better if he stopped making predictions about the markets. Touché.

BTFD  

Well so far at least the opening of this week based on FUTURES looks like DOWN HARD to me.  So I have to tip my hat off to armstrong for this week, it looks like he is going to be right about this panic cycle week.  Need to give credit where credit is due, not many traders can say ahead of time or weeks ahead of time when a panic cycle WEEK is going to occur.

Why is it irrelevant, the model still forecasts the correction, it is not something Martin made the arrays, to conform to it.  I am still waiting for testing the model before I pay for his subscription, Gumbi should send me the numbers soon. I am noticed, will alter the settings, now.

Also I see, lot of people here regurgitate the same phrases, Martin is a charlatan, bla. bla.? What is going on here? We don't need that, explain in detail what you want to say.


I don't personally know why the Pi dates seem to be spot on. Maybe it is just a fluke but just from my experience. I have no explanation for 2001.695, especially the one in April 2010 pi date, and May in 2007, and  Goldman Sachs getting sued. So I thought if similar affairs repeat maybe the recent Pi date should conform to it, so I waited and watched for any news about Goldman. And we had yet again on the same day, 2018.895 Goldman Sachs getting sued again.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/goldman-sachs-going-down-on-the-pi-target/
Even though it may seem a minor incident, not having broader implications, it shows that there is some order in how affairs are arranged.

And I also need an explanation for the claims of Princeton accumulating transactions, a little over 1 trillion dollars, read it in FX street, this is not some random blog website.  So what is this about? Is this with trading transactions or some weird money laundering, scam going on? I am not going to follow Martin with blind faith. It is a possibility that Martin is a scammer and that he did, in fact, did the deed which leads him to 11 years of solitary confinement.

And can anyone summarize what Armstrong is saying on his private blog on the Dow, for the record?

Never said anything about energy but commentary on reversals are included in the summary analysis and turning points(array)

"we have not elected any bullish reversals from the last low established during the third quarter 2019. "
https://imgur.com/a/GrhGH6D

that commentary( which you so vividly claim we shouldn't go by) constitutes sell signals with no point of reference or when they so called were generated

"the last reversal to be elected on the weekly level was a bullish the week of November the 18th"
https://imgur.com/aLhZoy0

There is the proof that it does in fact tell you when the last bullish/bearish reversal was elected and it is updated every single day. it is  a summary analysis your complaint is you don't get all the reversals which of course is the case you need to pay for the detailed analysis for all those levels.


its called SUMMARY ANALYSIS for a reason

If you look into the report every month, you will notice when a buy or sell signal is given.  The critical support/resistance numbers are NOT TA but Rev.
It's not that I tell you that you don't need the energy indicator, it's what Armstrong says.
Anyways, it looks like you are done with Socrates - so there is no point to continue the discussion.  It's a waste of time for both of us.

I remember the summary analysis being like what you described with very little information but that has changed.

I uploaded a current copper futures summary analysis, see link below. Commentary on reversals are included in this report and turning points(array)
https://imgur.com/a/GrhGH6D

at least 1 year, maybe longer.  Maybe more has changed in the last few month (as it did in the Pro Version).  I haven't followed the investor level lately.

I don't think this is correct anymore. It now mentions buy/sell signals, critical support / resistance and even turning points.