Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 24 results by vivacriptorey
So why are there expectations the market cap will be the same after the burn? Are there similar cases where this occured?
This hype is not only about burn, their CEO announced that Flik gonna hit Binance soon + rumour that Mark Cuban buying a large share in a company and becoming co-owner
ok thx for letting me know, but that is no answer to my question. Why people expect the market cap to be the same?
would be awesome tho ;-)
How many coins are they burning?
Re: [ANN][EMC2] Einsteinium | FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY
Hi peeps,
The roadmap on the site does not seem to give any time indicators. When is the webwallet + API expected to drop?
The roadmap on the site does not seem to give any time indicators. When is the webwallet + API expected to drop?
An update will be provided to the community this week
Thank bitcoin jesus I only put 0.3 BTC in this thing. I wrongly thought segwit would give it DGB-style hype 
Did you saw the drop DGB suffered?
Re: [ANN][EMC2] Einsteinium | FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY
Thank bitcoin jesus I only put 0.3 BTC in this thing. I wrongly thought segwit would give it DGB-style hype
DGB is mostly a pump and dump coin, where as EMC2 is a much better hold for the long term. Sometimes you have to be patient in order to make money from cryptoI would not say it better;) At this point the best is HODL what we have or even buy more! Big time is coming!
I won't sell at loss, that's for sure. I like the ideology of this project. Is there any successful project already founded by EMC2?
There are no proofs of such experience in your members. No github, no linkedin. Facebook is not a reliable information source in this space, you should know that by now. I can create a fake profile anytime, so could you. And I think you mean white shit lol.
As I said your opinion is subjective. You do not want to take the arguments that lead to you. A transition to obscene speech only speaks of your ignorance. You do not have any idea about how custom software is developing. And your opinion about fake social pages simply has no arguments. Therefore, I ask you not to litter our topic. And write here as soon as you have reasonable arguments about this dispute.
Just enough to warn people.
My arguments are solid, yours are not. "A fool and his money are soon parted"
Your arguments are not grounded on anything, they do not have a solid ground. I would advise you first to gain experience before entering into such discussions. And maybe it's enough to write nonsense?
You are the one who wrote pure nonsense in the white paper. One of my arguments is that you have no github, no verifiable code. How is that "not grounded"? It's fact. No verifiable experience from any of the members. Not grounded either? It's just another fact. I have enough experience to spot plain money grab ICOs, like this one. You won't fool anyone with enough experience just by saying "Neural Networks" a few times. It's laughable, I have seen better built scams. I get it, you have to defend your money grab. But I can keep exposing your bullshit all day long.
There are no proofs of such experience in your members. No github, no linkedin. Facebook is not a reliable information source in this space, you should know that by now. I can create a fake profile anytime, so could you. And I think you mean white shit lol.
As I said your opinion is subjective. You do not want to take the arguments that lead to you. A transition to obscene speech only speaks of your ignorance. You do not have any idea about how custom software is developing. And your opinion about fake social pages simply has no arguments. Therefore, I ask you not to litter our topic. And write here as soon as you have reasonable arguments about this dispute.
Just enough to warn people.
My arguments are solid, yours are not. "A fool and his money are soon parted"
Nursultan? Lol, just that name makes you run away. No github, whitepaper says actually NOTHING (just jibber jabber for the fools), no linkedin to any of the members. No thanks
You probably made a mistake, if you click on the photo, then click on the link to their social pages.
1. It wasn't there when I was checking, I am a hound. It was just added
2. Fake facebook profiles does not count, still non-verifiable backgrounds from the members
3. You defended the most irrelevant part, still no code available and whitepaper still jibber jabber
4. All people "supporting" the project here are new accounts, makes me more suspicious
Hello, thank you for your comment. It is very valuable to us. At the moment we are a local private enterprise working in our country. Our company works under the patent. We are engaged in the development of projects to order, so we do not have public pages of projects. All the projects we sell to the customer and in each contract indicates the non-disclosure of the project. You definitely noticed that we did not have links to social pages, but we fixed it. All social pages are real. Although at the moment we have some developments for this system, but they are not enough to release a demo project. The full development of the project will begin after ICO fees. Therefore, we found it unnecessary to insert into a white sheet. If you have any other questions, you can ask them in the topic or write a personal message to this account.
I just got hit by more bullshit. So sad the cryptoworld is plagued by idiots who will throw their money here anyways
Your perception of our project is completely subjective. You do not accept the arguments that we give to you. The white sheet describes the real principles of work used in information security. This is where the concept of people centric security is applied. To store the data, we used a model used by banks working on the block. They are also based on the principle of the work of the blockade and neural networks. Your reaction only indicates that you do not have sufficient level of awareness in this area. Before starting a dispute, you should increase your knowledge.
Nah, you are just using buzzwords, poorly trying to make your ICO look legit. I have seen it many MANY times. You just used the phrase Neural Network 4 times in your white paper, and you explain absolutely nothing. "model used by banks working on the block", complete nonsense. "The rights of a participation in auctions are defined by our neural network based on the set of rules, which are defined in the system." Nope, nothing. Jibber Jabber.
We do not try to use fashion words, but we really know what is behind them. Our team has experience in developing such systems. Before writing the project, we conducted an analysis of how the block was applied on the market. We looked in the direction of Alfa Bank, S7 Airlines, LightCyber and many other systems. We identified problems in the market and developed the best solution. And about the white sheet. The rules for calculating the right of participation can be set by the users themselves. That is, the user will enter the restrictions that he needs at the moment. In addition, we have provided standard conditions, such as age limits, violence rating, gender equality and so on. If you have any further questions do not hesitate to contact. After all, your interest in our system is pleasant to us.
There are no proofs of such experience in your members. No github, no linkedin. Facebook is not a reliable information source in this space, you should know that by now. I can create a fake profile anytime, so could you. And I think you mean white shit lol.
Nursultan? Lol, just that name makes you run away. No github, whitepaper says actually NOTHING (just jibber jabber for the fools), no linkedin to any of the members. No thanks
You probably made a mistake, if you click on the photo, then click on the link to their social pages.
1. It wasn't there when I was checking, I am a hound. It was just added
2. Fake facebook profiles does not count, still non-verifiable backgrounds from the members
3. You defended the most irrelevant part, still no code available and whitepaper still jibber jabber
4. All people "supporting" the project here are new accounts, makes me more suspicious
Hello, thank you for your comment. It is very valuable to us. At the moment we are a local private enterprise working in our country. Our company works under the patent. We are engaged in the development of projects to order, so we do not have public pages of projects. All the projects we sell to the customer and in each contract indicates the non-disclosure of the project. You definitely noticed that we did not have links to social pages, but we fixed it. All social pages are real. Although at the moment we have some developments for this system, but they are not enough to release a demo project. The full development of the project will begin after ICO fees. Therefore, we found it unnecessary to insert into a white sheet. If you have any other questions, you can ask them in the topic or write a personal message to this account.
I just got hit by more bullshit. So sad the cryptoworld is plagued by idiots who will throw their money here anyways
Your perception of our project is completely subjective. You do not accept the arguments that we give to you. The white sheet describes the real principles of work used in information security. This is where the concept of people centric security is applied. To store the data, we used a model used by banks working on the block. They are also based on the principle of the work of the blockade and neural networks. Your reaction only indicates that you do not have sufficient level of awareness in this area. Before starting a dispute, you should increase your knowledge.
Nah, you are just using buzzwords, poorly trying to make your ICO look legit. I have seen it many MANY times. You just used the phrase Neural Network 4 times in your white paper, and you explain absolutely nothing. "model used by banks working on the block", complete nonsense. "The rights of a participation in auctions are defined by our neural network based on the set of rules, which are defined in the system." Nope, nothing. Jibber Jabber.
Re: [ANN][PEPE][MEME] PepeCoin A.K.A Memetic - Kekdaq.com - MasterToads - IPFS
What is the max coin supply? Or is it uncapped?
From the Telegram.
Ree Agent, [04.08.17 22:33]
that max_money variable is the largest transaction that can be sent on the network, not a max supply cap... the supply though is like i said the reward curve halves and curves down and so its like bitcoin where it eventually halves to such a low amount that it approaches and stays under that point, and then yeah it is just the 7% PoS inflation
Don't you have an easier answer? Normies won't understand that. I barely do
there is no max cap.
it continues with halfing the reward until there is shit squared left.
like 7 coins ->3.5 -> 1.75 -> and so on...... so one day its 0.00000000x and wont even add whole coins in Aeons
I hope POS Reward also goes down with it.
That was better. Thanks!
Nursultan? Lol, just that name makes you run away. No github, whitepaper says actually NOTHING (just jibber jabber for the fools), no linkedin to any of the members. No thanks
You probably made a mistake, if you click on the photo, then click on the link to their social pages.
1. It wasn't there when I was checking, I am a hound. It was just added
2. Fake facebook profiles does not count, still non-verifiable backgrounds from the members
3. You defended the most irrelevant part, still no code available and whitepaper still jibber jabber
4. All people "supporting" the project here are new accounts, makes me more suspicious
Hello, thank you for your comment. It is very valuable to us. At the moment we are a local private enterprise working in our country. Our company works under the patent. We are engaged in the development of projects to order, so we do not have public pages of projects. All the projects we sell to the customer and in each contract indicates the non-disclosure of the project. You definitely noticed that we did not have links to social pages, but we fixed it. All social pages are real. Although at the moment we have some developments for this system, but they are not enough to release a demo project. The full development of the project will begin after ICO fees. Therefore, we found it unnecessary to insert into a white sheet. If you have any other questions, you can ask them in the topic or write a personal message to this account.
I just got hit by more bullshit. So sad the cryptoworld is plagued by idiots who will throw their money here anyways
Re: [ANN][PEPE][MEME] PepeCoin A.K.A Memetic - Kekdaq.com - MasterToads - IPFS
What is the max coin supply? Or is it uncapped?
From the Telegram.
Ree Agent, [04.08.17 22:33]
that max_money variable is the largest transaction that can be sent on the network, not a max supply cap... the supply though is like i said the reward curve halves and curves down and so its like bitcoin where it eventually halves to such a low amount that it approaches and stays under that point, and then yeah it is just the 7% PoS inflation
Don't you have an easier answer? Normies won't understand that. I barely do
Nursultan? Lol, just that name makes you run away. No github, whitepaper says actually NOTHING (just jibber jabber for the fools), no linkedin to any of the members. No thanks
You probably made a mistake, if you click on the photo, then click on the link to their social pages.
1. It wasn't there when I was checking, I am a hound. It was just added
2. Fake facebook profiles does not count, still non-verifiable backgrounds from the members
3. You defended the most irrelevant part, still no code available and whitepaper still jibber jabber
4. All people "supporting" the project here are new accounts, makes me more suspicious
Nursultan? Lol, just that name makes you run away. No github, whitepaper says actually NOTHING (just jibber jabber for the fools), no linkedin to any of the members. No thanks