The family of David Kleiman (via his estate) is suing Craig S Wright for half of the bitcoin that satoshi mined in bitcoin's early days
This just got a whole lot interesting, not that am taking Wrights side, but what happens if the court does pass a ruling in favor of David Kleiman family....will Craig honor the courts demand to share the loot which if converted in usd is quite a lot of benjamins!!
I hope Craig S Wright will put this topic to rest after hurting his pocket, because the man just doesn't know when to stop when he has failed to prove his ill gotten identity.
WSJ should be ashamed for writing an article like this. Attempting to get as many clicks as possible or not, they are giving Craig credibility which is a shame.
This is nothing more than a click bait scheme by WSj and they know it because running such a story can easily bring them some traffic, and possibly subcribers for their services.
Wright is currently trying to sue several bitcoin companies because he "lost" his keys. hes also not satoshi and i can tell you why very simply
hes NEVER publicly signed a signature from a know satoshi wallet that could simply be verified by anyone that wants to check.
i can fully buy and understand the fact hes lost the wallets most of us have been there at some point. but the big thing for me is satoshi has been around several times to say no this person isnt me. if DR wright is satoshi he could sign into his account on any platform and simply say see this is me. i believe that satoshi simply wants this to play out and see what happens or has passed away.
if the court believes wright is satoshi then hes going to be in and out of court for years getting sued (especially if he wins the court cases for his lost bitcoin) and if hes proven not to be satoshi hes still going to get sued for affecting companys credibility. its another reason i dont think hes satoshi, Satoshi was a smart person coverd his tracks careful who he spoke to Dr Wright is in a loose loose situation something i cant see satoshi doing.