Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 308 results by wooder
eth classic's smartcontract's will be the same as ethereum? Or it will be worst/better?
Probably yes.. since they have same core source code...
probably.
As far as I remember Dexaran (Ethereum Commonwealth) wanted to use another language, Viper because it's more secure.
Found a quote of Dexaran himslef: "We all know that smart-contracts are often hacked. It is caused by problems of Solidity programming language. As a smart-contract auditor I can say that Viper could significantly improve readability of smart-contracts and boost their safety."
ETH is completely overhyped. the marketing seems to be well financed as every poopoo that is just in the brains of devs is promoted as if it is a new finished feature (https://www.coindesk.com/new-ideas-energize-ethereum-though-true-signaling-solution-still-elusive/), wtf. the current smart contract mentality in a lawyer's world is like signing contracts that are not available when signing or they are written in a language that the signatory doesn't speak/is able to read, who will except of some nerds and ethereum shills use and more important trust them?
I think ETC's m2m IOT focused direction is the way to go, no hype, steady development and contracts that are written and tested by pros and not people that can c&p a erc20 token and replace some strings in it
Will ETC be hardfork or not ?? Some body said on reddit that will not hard fork on end of may
Why ETC has to be hardforked?
Its difficulty removal.
the ETH devs implemented the difficulty bomb to force users to hard fork at least at predefined dates in future otherwise the difficulty will rise to astronomic levels.
the same will happen when casper is released. the smart contract that will pay the POS miners will run out of ETH (i think it's 10 millions) after some time.
So after that we will have another fork to limitate the max supply of coins?
this is not ethereum. the hard fork will remove the difficulty bomb and i don't know if the number of coins will be limited
in my opinion the direction that this coin takes should be decided by the community. ETH is controlled by a few devs and buterin is the figurehead. I don't want to participate in a project like ETH that is developed in a completely centralised way behind closed doors.
I would even go that far and say that this development model (that is marketed as decentralised) will in the long run hurt ETH
Will ETC be hardfork or not ?? Some body said on reddit that will not hard fork on end of may
Why ETC has to be hardforked?
Its difficulty removal.
the ETH devs implemented the difficulty bomb to force users to hard fork at least at predefined dates in future otherwise the difficulty will rise to astronomic levels.
the same will happen when casper is released. the smart contract that will pay the POS miners will run out of ETH (i think it's 10 millions) after some time.
the whole coin should be promoted as the immutable un-hyped ETH that will be used for IOT communication. the ICO craze that didn't create any meaningful product (i wouldn't count useless half decentralized smart contracts/collectibles like "crypto cats" a useful invention), as the ICO craze was used to suck out the money of innocent users that "invested" in projects that didn't have more then a few pages in a pdf with promises that will never come true (ERC20 even lowered the level of entry for scammers). And therefore ETC should be marketed as the responsible coin, in contrast to ETH which is the scammers test bed that shows how contracts shouldn't be constructed and brought to the masses without any quality standards. the hype made buterin a rich man but the ethical responsibly to educate users to not buy into this "premined" ERC20 shitcoins wasn't met in any way.
i think about ETH "news" like this: https://cryptoslate.com/batchoverflow-exploit-creates-trillions-of-ethereum-tokens/, https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ywbqmg/parity-multi-signature-wallet-vulnerability-300-million-hard-fork
Please don't walk the same road as ethereum and lower the level of entry to levels where the dumbest scammer can trick people to buy into scams like the ERC20 ETH scams
Keep up the good work
i think about ETH "news" like this: https://cryptoslate.com/batchoverflow-exploit-creates-trillions-of-ethereum-tokens/, https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ywbqmg/parity-multi-signature-wallet-vulnerability-300-million-hard-fork
Please don't walk the same road as ethereum and lower the level of entry to levels where the dumbest scammer can trick people to buy into scams like the ERC20 ETH scams
Keep up the good work
any news in the pipe? just saying that ETC is/will be an IOT coin doesn't feel like that there are any interesting things going on. the coin is bleeding since months and it seems the dropping will go on until something happens, that shows that there is still active development happening. also the distinction from the ETH team is important as ETH doesn't have any real usage by now except of scam ICOs, worthless ERC20 tokens and blockchain "games" that are completely useless. to be honest, i don't really understand why ETH is valued that high and ETC is just bleeding.
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
That horse has been beaten to death already.
Most funds where in alt coins that lost value to the market. Expenses has been accounted for and critiqued/scrutinized by the community. The software has been delivered and all extra expenses has been covered personally by AtcSecure.
Most funds where in alt coins that lost value to the market. Expenses has been accounted for and critiqued/scrutinized by the community. The software has been delivered and all extra expenses has been covered personally by AtcSecure.
This.
thats no explaination. if it was put into alts why wasn't it stated here? http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts - this feels like back in the xc days, where it was promised to keep expenses of the premine public and then atcsecure "forgot" about it.
this is no FUD at all. if you invest in something you should inform yourself, and doing the same thing two times, promise A and do B is a showstopper. btw XC didn't loose value because of mintpal. It lost value because development stopped and promissed stuff was never delivered
So fudders decided to get cheap coins?
or new bagholders to dump on them. even if there is some development happening, look at syscoin for example. tech isn't everything. a user base at best mass adoption is needed and i don't see trading people at a pre alpha DX. it will take some time IF it ever reaches a stable and responsive (trades have to happen within milliseconds) state. and i don't see this happening anytime soon to be honest, at least not with a dev that leaves one project for another to come back after months/years to resurrect it
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
That horse has been beaten to death already.
Most funds where in alt coins that lost value to the market. Expenses has been accounted for and critiqued/scrutinized by the community. The software has been delivered and all extra expenses has been covered personally by AtcSecure.
Most funds where in alt coins that lost value to the market. Expenses has been accounted for and critiqued/scrutinized by the community. The software has been delivered and all extra expenses has been covered personally by AtcSecure.
This.
thats no explaination. if it was put into alts why wasn't it stated here? http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts - this feels like back in the xc days, where it was promised to keep expenses of the premine public and then atcsecure "forgot" about it.
this is no FUD at all. if you invest in something you should inform yourself, and doing the same thing two times, promise A and do B is a showstopper. btw XC didn't loose value because of mintpal. It lost value because development stopped and promissed stuff was never delivered
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
That horse has been beaten to death already.
Most funds where in alt coins that lost value to the market. Expenses has been accounted for and critiqued/scrutinized by the community. The software has been delivered and all extra expenses has been covered personally by AtcSecure.
I don't see why You would dig up this old FUD...
Why don't you download the software and try it for yourself? How can you FUD after blocknet has delivered what promised?
Yes the XC roadmap changed, but so did the customer segment. XC changed to survive. It is still active and is still being developed on without new funding. Some pump groups might have pumped XC like they have most other coins but the devs never dumped, they have continued to focus on developing technology even when the market has worked against them and when basement rats have made psychopathic attacks on them.
Most funds where in alt coins that lost value to the market. Expenses has been accounted for and critiqued/scrutinized by the community. The software has been delivered and all extra expenses has been covered personally by AtcSecure.
I don't see why You would dig up this old FUD...
Why don't you download the software and try it for yourself? How can you FUD after blocknet has delivered what promised?
Yes the XC roadmap changed, but so did the customer segment. XC changed to survive. It is still active and is still being developed on without new funding. Some pump groups might have pumped XC like they have most other coins but the devs never dumped, they have continued to focus on developing technology even when the market has worked against them and when basement rats have made psychopathic attacks on them.
Why old FUD? Can you please link to the explaination what happend to the money?
XC changed to survive - development stopped and you call this survive.
Why was the team creating http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts in the official wiki at all, when it just records a small part of all expenses of the 1000 BTC?
This feels like muslim people that are not allowed to ask questions about the religion aka "Eat the shit and shut up"
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.
The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software. Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off
Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" .
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself
.Terrible they neglected these projects so much on here and let polo delist.
However, they have stuck around rather than totally vanish so lets hope they get some back bone and return here to the forums and stop hiding away on slack
I have bought some block back and a tiny amount of xc. Let's see what happens.
If they come back to the board with some results from months of hiding and start rebuilding the community on this board that will demonstrate to me block is not a scam. Same for xc do something with it.
If it were a full scam they would be gone by now.
Seems xc got a rough deal to me. Block can probably make a big come back if they are serious about it. XC well I hope so too although the silence on this board makes it look dead to most people.
Nobody has time for all the different slacks and other boards. Just come back to crypto capital here asap.
Lets see for 2017 the polo delist may have helped some get into block cheap or maybe produced another bunch of poor bagholders. Let;s see.
i would dump. no one with at least one brain cell will trust these scammers anymore. Just look at this: http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts. The expenses of blocknet "tracked", last entry "2015-04-23 "
It took them more then two years to deliver nearly nothing with a stunning "Estimated BTC Total is 969.31" lured out at ITO times
. Can't believe they will get away with this ...And they will stay and make maybe another 1000BTC at the next (empty promise) pump/ITO ...
Don't say you haven't been warned
I totally agree with you that that does look very bad.
Thing is Dans full ID is known. A blatant scam of nearly 1000BTC would guarantee some serious issues for him and anyone else closely involved.
Lets hope there will be a ledger of expenses arriving soon with his return to the forum and some large developments the block xc community are going to go wild over.
Lets hear what they say when there is a return to the forum. 1000 BTC can;t just have vanished on nothing.
If there is no return here and nothing comes of this in a reasonable time then ........
@atcsecure: where can one find the expenses after the "2015-04-23"? there were nearly 1000 BTC from the ITO
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.
The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software. Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off
Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" .
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself
.Terrible they neglected these projects so much on here and let polo delist.
However, they have stuck around rather than totally vanish so lets hope they get some back bone and return here to the forums and stop hiding away on slack
I have bought some block back and a tiny amount of xc. Let's see what happens.
If they come back to the board with some results from months of hiding and start rebuilding the community on this board that will demonstrate to me block is not a scam. Same for xc do something with it.
If it were a full scam they would be gone by now.
Seems xc got a rough deal to me. Block can probably make a big come back if they are serious about it. XC well I hope so too although the silence on this board makes it look dead to most people.
Nobody has time for all the different slacks and other boards. Just come back to crypto capital here asap.
Lets see for 2017 the polo delist may have helped some get into block cheap or maybe produced another bunch of poor bagholders. Let;s see.
i would dump. no one with at least one brain cell will trust these scammers anymore. Just look at this: http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts. The expenses of blocknet "tracked", last entry "2015-04-23 "
It took them more then two years to deliver nearly nothing with a stunning "Estimated BTC Total is 969.31" lured out at ITO times
. Can't believe they will get away with this ...And they will stay and make maybe another 1000BTC at the next (empty promise) pump/ITO ...
Don't say you haven't been warned
I totally agree with you that that does look very bad.
Thing is Dans full ID is known. A blatant scam of nearly 1000BTC would guarantee some serious issues for him and anyone else closely involved.
Lets hope there will be a ledger of expenses arriving soon with his return to the forum and some large developments the block xc community are going to go wild over.
Lets hear what they say when there is a return to the forum. 1000 BTC can;t just have vanished on nothing.
If there is no return here and nothing comes of this in a reasonable time then ........
The link in the wiki http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Accountability_Measures - PROOF OF DEVELOPER is dead - but hey there is
https://web.archive.org/web/20150108230748/http://www.coinssource.com/trust-index/blocknet-blockand this linkedin profile which reads like a scammer's profile
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/dan-metcalf-b821a812The last time i posted something in here it got deleted. let's see how it works out this time
I think this is my first kind act this year. People save your money and don't try to be the next-gen BLOCKNET/XC bagholders
And i think the ITO will have no consequnces for him, as he can always say he underestimated the time it needs to develop these apps (although nothing really happend the last few months)
taken form here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=829576.msg17377400#msg17377400
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.
The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software. Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off
Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" .
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself
.Terrible they neglected these projects so much on here and let polo delist.
However, they have stuck around rather than totally vanish so lets hope they get some back bone and return here to the forums and stop hiding away on slack
I have bought some block back and a tiny amount of xc. Let's see what happens.
If they come back to the board with some results from months of hiding and start rebuilding the community on this board that will demonstrate to me block is not a scam. Same for xc do something with it.
If it were a full scam they would be gone by now.
Seems xc got a rough deal to me. Block can probably make a big come back if they are serious about it. XC well I hope so too although the silence on this board makes it look dead to most people.
Nobody has time for all the different slacks and other boards. Just come back to crypto capital here asap.
Lets see for 2017 the polo delist may have helped some get into block cheap or maybe produced another bunch of poor bagholders. Let;s see.
i would dump. no one with at least one brain cell will trust these scammers anymore. Just look at this: http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts. The expenses of blocknet "tracked", last entry "2015-04-23 "
It took them more then two years to deliver nearly nothing with a stunning "Estimated BTC Total is 969.31" lured out at ITO times
. Can't believe they will get away with this ...And they will stay and make maybe another 1000BTC at the next (empty promise) pump/ITO ...
Don't say you haven't been warned
I totally agree with you that that does look very bad.
Thing is Dans full ID is known. A blatant scam of nearly 1000BTC would guarantee some serious issues for him and anyone else closely involved.
Lets hope there will be a ledger of expenses arriving soon with his return to the forum and some large developments the block xc community are going to go wild over.
Lets hear what they say when there is a return to the forum. 1000 BTC can;t just have vanished on nothing.
If there is no return here and nothing comes of this in a reasonable time then ........
The link in the wiki http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Accountability_Measures - PROOF OF DEVELOPER is dead - but hey there is
https://web.archive.org/web/20150108230748/http://www.coinssource.com/trust-index/blocknet-blockand this linkedin profile which reads like a scammer's profile
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/dan-metcalf-b821a812The last time i posted something in here it got deleted. let's see how it works out this time
I think this is my first kind act this year. People save your money and don't try to be the next-gen BLOCKNET/XC bagholders
And i think the ITO will have no consequnces for him, as he can always say he underestimated the time it needs to develop these apps (although nothing really happend the last few months)
i will double posted it here just in case: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=830893.msg17377482#msg17377482
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.
The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software. Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off
Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" .
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself
.Terrible they neglected these projects so much on here and let polo delist.
However, they have stuck around rather than totally vanish so lets hope they get some back bone and return here to the forums and stop hiding away on slack
I have bought some block back and a tiny amount of xc. Let's see what happens.
If they come back to the board with some results from months of hiding and start rebuilding the community on this board that will demonstrate to me block is not a scam. Same for xc do something with it.
If it were a full scam they would be gone by now.
Seems xc got a rough deal to me. Block can probably make a big come back if they are serious about it. XC well I hope so too although the silence on this board makes it look dead to most people.
Nobody has time for all the different slacks and other boards. Just come back to crypto capital here asap.
Lets see for 2017 the polo delist may have helped some get into block cheap or maybe produced another bunch of poor bagholders. Let;s see.
i would dump. no one with at least one brain cell will trust these scammers anymore. Just look at this: http://wiki.blocknet.co/index.php/Record_of_Accounts. The expenses of blocknet "tracked", last entry "2015-04-23 "
It took them more then two years to deliver nearly nothing with a stunning "Estimated BTC Total is 969.31" lured out at ITO times
. Can't believe they will get away with this ...And they will stay and make maybe another 1000BTC at the next (empty promise) pump/ITO ...
Don't say you haven't been warned
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
Quote
That's why this scam hides in places where people can't ask important questions, nor express dissenting, ie non-cheerleading, opinions.
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
Polo should have never listed the XC and Blocknet scams to begin with. Doing so brings the exchange additional technical risk from bad code and legal risk from facilitating the scam(s).
I love how we have functional software products for both XC and Blocknet and yet you cry scam, while all along we have been answering questions in slack and doing real user testing.
The only scam here is you coming here and making this statement when actual users have used the software. Why don't you go crawl back into your hole and piss off
Thats the way the main dev should talk to people. I just followed the thread and it still feels to me this is vaporware. XC never provided the promissed functionality and was once traded for 1mBTC.
You provided a roadmap and just dropped it without any explaination and when someone asked about it, the story was told "that something will be released soon" .
I still hope no new bagholders get lured into this shitcoins. The current price of BLOCK also speaks for itself
.Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
Looks like Block and XST are in the same boat: price crashed and panic/fud/troll began simultaneously LOL
Good luck atcsecure and synechist
Good luck atcsecure and synechist
whatever you say... don't cry when the coin drops even harder. the biggest exchange is delisting it but yeah, this is FUD
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
Blocknet BLOCK added to TradeSatoshi
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_BTC
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_DOGE
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_LTC
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Faucet
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_BTC
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_DOGE
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_LTC
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Faucet
come on don't try to find new bagholders.
this is vaporware at it's best, like XC. Still unbelievable how long it was possible to keep this brick above water
I'm sorry for all bagholders. People don't trust this dev and don't buy into this coin when the next ground breaking news promise stuff that will never be delivered
also look at https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknet - the dev now seems to try to update the README files to give the impression of active "development".
vapor ware?
the DX is on its 3rd major update, we have already done cross chain transactions using nlocktime, but we have refactored to support BIP65/cltv due to transaction malleability..
why don't you follow the link in the readme to see the actual updates of the dx?
its all there in the repo
The BIP65/CLTV based POC/Demo is launching this week.
what a coincidence, news appear after the collapse. but i'm used to this strategy. i trusted you back in XC times but i think you lost all trust at least from me after you left XC and focused on BLOCK years ago, although promising something else. when will we see a stable release? in 2020?
rootstock will be a sidechain for bitcoin that will just do this and is backed by bitcoins hash power and provides ETH functionality. i think no one needs a layer to send bitcoins between useless chains (which is still far away from a stable release)
hopefully you won't lure new people into this sinking ship
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
Blocknet BLOCK added to TradeSatoshi
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_BTC
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_DOGE
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_LTC
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Faucet
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_BTC
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_DOGE
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Exchange?market=BLOCK_LTC
https://www.tradesatoshi.com/Faucet
come on don't try to find new bagholders.
this is vaporware at it's best, like XC. Still unbelievable how long it was possible to keep this brick above water
I'm sorry for all bagholders. People don't trust this dev and don't buy into this coin when the next ground breaking news promise stuff that will never be delivered
also look at https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknet - the dev now seems to try to update the README files to give the impression of active "development".
Re: ANN [XC] Privacy Based Smart Chain with Automated Build System
vaporware at it's best like BLOCK. Still unbelievable how long it was possible to keep this brick above water
I'm sorry for all bagholders. People don't trust this dev and don't enter this coin when the next ground breaking news promise stuff that will never be delivered
I'm sorry for all bagholders. People don't trust this dev and don't enter this coin when the next ground breaking news promise stuff that will never be delivered
Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains | XBridge | true cross-chain P2P
I can't believe you guys are still supporting this crap. You guys need to get laid.
i think so too. I abandoned the ship along time ago. Can't believe that people still support this crap coins (BLOCK/XC)
This is vaporware at it's best
Re: ⚒ Syscoin - LIVE Decentralized Marketplace, Encrypted Messaging, Escrow & more ☍
Wow, I cannot believe the price keeps dropping like this...
I wish I had more BTC to put into this !!
I wish I had more BTC to put into this !!
there are no news, a postponed release and btc is rising, what did you expect? i think the bleeding has just begun