Search content
Sort by

Showing 19 of 19 results by xa4
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation
by
xa4
on 19/05/2015, 19:59:54 UTC
Can someone talk a bit about lending XMR in Poloniex? What are the risks? Does it worth it? etc...

My first steps in margin trading and this is my experience so far :

1. I bought a short position. The lending is automatic, meaning I (presumably) got the cheapest rate and the rate varies automatically when cheaper (lower rate) loans are offered e.g. initial BTC XMR lending at 0.0374% and during my position it went automatically down to 0.0365%

2. I offered a BTC loan at 0.045% for 2 days. The fees are accumulating as long as the lender doesn't close his position. 0.045%/day  = ~17% annualized, which isn't bad I think.

What I don't understand is my loan is still active at 0.045% while there are cheaper loans right now ? I'd guess the lender would get those cheaper loans automatically like I  did ?
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation
by
xa4
on 14/04/2015, 20:05:59 UTC
I am sorry that your explanation did not inspire confidence to invest in it. Despite my totally non-tech background, I know reasonably well how Monero operates, and it should not be impossible to gain the same understanding from emunie, although not from that explanation  Tongue

Yes, I would not recommend anyone make investment decisions from random forum posts, but I suspect you already know that Smiley Everyone needs to do their own research and make their own mind up. I was skeptical of emunie for a long while, but I am excited by their attempt to use the basic truth of the Quantity Theory of Money (MV=PQ) within a P2P network where all vaiables are known in real time, to achieve a worthwhile goal of price stability. Whether they achieve that is uncertain, but if they do then things will change quite a bit.

Why is this simplistic economic equation MV=PQ so popular, even among many bitcoiners ? It's pseudo science in my opinion.     

Aren't we just in these days worldwide witnessing that the equation is rather stupid and doesn't fit? It is pseudo science (and wrong at that even).

Well, actually I don't know, but it would make a lot of sense. I wonder if there is one equation that fits ? How would you take into account economic reality is distorted and manipulated by "the vile maxim of the masters of mankind" ?   
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation
by
xa4
on 14/04/2015, 19:26:50 UTC
I am sorry that your explanation did not inspire confidence to invest in it. Despite my totally non-tech background, I know reasonably well how Monero operates, and it should not be impossible to gain the same understanding from emunie, although not from that explanation  Tongue

Yes, I would not recommend anyone make investment decisions from random forum posts, but I suspect you already know that Smiley Everyone needs to do their own research and make their own mind up. I was skeptical of emunie for a long while, but I am excited by their attempt to use the basic truth of the Quantity Theory of Money (MV=PQ) within a P2P network where all vaiables are known in real time, to achieve a worthwhile goal of price stability. Whether they achieve that is uncertain, but if they do then things will change quite a bit.

Why is this simplistic economic equation MV=PQ so popular, even among many bitcoiners ? It's pseudo science in my opinion.     
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation
by
xa4
on 13/04/2015, 17:41:17 UTC
^^^Made this

www.googledrive.com/host/0B8ddMzM9RWuRZUFmMDVZMlB2Q2s

Some experiments with D3.js ... it's a zoomable graph of XMR emission. Maybe someone can use it.

EDIT : Y-axis are percentages of total supply according to the emission formula


Neat! Does this incorporate the tail emissions? it stopped at 2040, so .....

I made a new graph with tail emission :

www.googledrive.com/host/0B8ddMzM9RWuROEVrbnE0U1RXaTQ

The model makes following assumptions :
* genesis block @ april 18 2014 00:00:00 (according to Moneroblocks.eu the first block was mined @ 2014-04-18 10:49:53 UTC, but something isn't working properly in my javascript code)
* every block gets mined exactly every 60sec
* it doesn't take penalties into account
* every block reward gets calculated according to the formula : (M - A) * 2-20 * 10-12 with A the current supply and M = Atomic Units = 264-1 and the calculated block reward is added to the current supply UNTIL the calculated block reward <=0.3 XMR
* Whenever the calculated block reward for block x <=0.3XMR the actual block reward for block x to block x+infinity becomes exactly 0.3XMR

Some calculations I made with this model (it calculates 26280000 blocks ~ 50 years) :
* first block with a calculated block reward < 0.3XMR is block 4269201 ~ 2022-4-30 (year 9) with a current supply = 98.29469862785216% of M
* block 5317920 ~ 2024-4-27 (year 11) is the first block for which the current supply >= 100% of M (from now on current supply grows greater than M ?)
* year over year inflation at the end of year 9 = 0.874171704788429%. (Indeed ~0.9% see Smooth's reply)
* year over year inflation is calculated every year. You can look at them by pressing F12 in your browser.

Javascript code is very messy, so I could have made a mistake. If something is wrong with my reasoning and assumptions for this model, or any suggestions to fine-tune the model, please tell me.

EDIT : definitions of A and M
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation
by
xa4
on 12/04/2015, 23:38:12 UTC
When - what date or what blockheight - would the tail emission kick in ?  

It is hard to know the exact date/block because it depends on penalties. Each block's reward is a function of the actual number of coins created so far.

It will kick in whenever the reward according to the formula would be less than 0.3 XMR (approx 0.9% annually), which is expected some time around year 8.


Why 0.9%?


Edit: I guess what I'm asking is, what is the actual formula for the tail emission, the resultant inflation year over year and why was that amount chosen?

The formula is "0.3"

The amount was chosen based on being a round number within and close to the <1% inflation maintenance reward specified in the ANN OP.



I found this on github

Code:
+#define FINAL_SUBSIDY_PER_MINUTE ((uint64_t)300000000000) // 3 * pow(10, 11)

Does this mean a constant block reward = 0.3XMR ?
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation
by
xa4
on 12/04/2015, 16:26:21 UTC
^^^Made this

www.googledrive.com/host/0B8ddMzM9RWuRZUFmMDVZMlB2Q2s

Some experiments with D3.js ... it's a zoomable graph of XMR emission. Maybe someone can use it.

EDIT : Y-axis are percentages of total supply according to the emission formula


Neat! Does this incorporate the tail emissions? it stopped at 2040, so .....

It's simple javascript calculating the supply every minute according to :

* Actual number of atomic units is M = 264 - 1. A minimum subsidy may be implemented in the future with <1% annual inflation to preserve mining incentives.
* Uses a recurrence relation. Block reward = (M - A) * 2-20 * 10-12, where A = current circulation. Roughly 86% mined in 4 years (see graph)

You can copy paste the code and run it locally in your browser. The example calculates 525600*26 blocks (see javascript code) ... you can change that to any number you want.

When - what date or what blockheight - would the tail emission kick in ?  

EDIT : 525600*26 = 26 years each year 525600 blocks one block every min.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation
by
xa4
on 12/04/2015, 15:49:32 UTC
Quote
If you look at the top left corner, you will see that it's not actually tradingview, but rather cryptrader.com. Uses the same engine as TV, much like coingy.

Oooh, interesting, thx.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation
by
xa4
on 12/04/2015, 13:53:08 UTC


I do not see a 0.0028 to 0.0045 trading range, rather I see an upwards trendline channel with very strong support at 0.0028 with two scenarios. 1) Continuation of the trendline channel with a test of 0.0050 and a possible test of 0.0058. A break of the upward trendline would be very bullish and could lead to a test of 0.010. 2) My second choice is a breakdown of the bottom trendline and possibly a break below 0.0028.  

Hello ArticMine,

How do you view Poloniex BTC/XMR in tradingview ?
Post
Topic
Board Speculation (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation
by
xa4
on 12/04/2015, 13:39:09 UTC
^^^Made this

www.googledrive.com/host/0B8ddMzM9RWuRZUFmMDVZMlB2Q2s

Some experiments with D3.js ... it's a zoomable graph of XMR emission. Maybe someone can use it.

EDIT : Y-axis are percentages of total supply according to the emission formula



Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Monero Support
by
xa4
on 01/04/2015, 19:50:08 UTC
^You can't convert non-deterministic wallet to deterministic one. You should create a new wallet if you want to use this functionality.

Edited...

Thx for the info.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Monero Support
by
xa4
on 01/04/2015, 15:25:06 UTC
I have an 0.8.8.3 wallet (3 files : xxx.bin, xxx.bin.keys and xxx.bin.address.txt) and opened it in 0.8.8.6. I got following message "You had been using a deprecated version of the wallet. Your wallet file format is being upgraded now" and everything looks fine.

Can I upgrade this wallet to a deterministic wallet with seed or do I have to create a new wallet with seed and transfer the coins ? I think I remember reading somewhere you could upgrade an old wallet without seed to a wallet with seed, but I'm not sure. 



Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Logarithmic (non-linear) regression - Bitcoin estimated value
by
xa4
on 20/11/2014, 00:26:03 UTC
Hey, thanks for sharing your work.

Quote
I suspect that in the very long term (reaching year 2075 i.e.) the linear price axis graph would look like an "S" curve (logistic growth). Pending task...

I'm not sure the linear price axis graph should look like an S curve. I believe this could be true for adoption or #users, network hashing power + others, their growth is bound by max resources, Bitcoin price however isn't bound by any resources in my opinion. That's why I prefer your model to Stephen Reed's logistic model, you don't have an arbitrarily $1000000 price limit.

EDIT : even #users isn't bound to max resources if you count bots, agents, DACs, machines, ... in the future.
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][XMR] monero.crypto-pool.fr | Large Monero Mining Pool
by
xa4
on 13/07/2014, 23:03:15 UTC
Small question : how do you calculate the 'network hash rate' ?
I thought it was 'Diff/60', but that's not what I see on the pool's mainpage (neither on other pools' mainpage) What formula are you using ?
Thx. 
 
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Cryptocurrency: Lighting the match for the digital revolution
by
xa4
on 11/07/2014, 23:49:24 UTC
Heck, everything will become decentralized, even nation states will become obsolete ...
Not before our culture makes violence obsolete by beginning to govern the world with reason instead.

At the rate we're going, that could take quite a while.

Taking the history of human kind into consideration , lets say 100.000 years, reason is (maybe arguably) the winning meme (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meme) and once it reaches a certain point, there's accelerated or exponential growth in adoption. Quite a while is a relative notion.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Cryptocurrency: Lighting the match for the digital revolution
by
xa4
on 11/07/2014, 22:50:55 UTC
Heck, everything will become decentralized, even nation states will become obsolete ... it's called P2P with its globally scaled small group dynamics.
Post
Topic
Board Meetings (Nederlands)
Re: Bitcoin Meet Gent - zaterdag 28 juni vanaf 19:30
by
xa4
on 30/05/2014, 17:07:03 UTC
Hey dnaleor,

Bedankt voor de monero tip. Dankzij monero ben ik mij beginnen verdiepen in altcoins ... ik volgde reeds ethereum en maidsafe, maar verder had ik de indruk dat altcoins goedkope afkooksels waren van Bitcoin. Nu niet meer, altcoins als monero (of meer bepaald cryptonote/cryptonight) bieden effectief een meerwaarde...in dit geval anonimiteit (wat niet voor iedereen positief onthaald wordt), maar oook 'fungibility' (= vervangbaar), wat mij toch een belangrijke tekortkoming lijkt van Bitcoin.

thx

   
Post
Topic
Board Meetings (Nederlands)
Re: Bitcoin Meet Gent - zaterdag 1 februari vanaf 19:30
by
xa4
on 10/01/2014, 17:39:15 UTC
OK, i got it ... thx voor de replies. Toch nog een vraagje : op welke exchanges kan je kopen. Ik ga er vanuit dat ook hier de machine te programmeren is voor verschillende exchanges ?

xa4
Post
Topic
Board Meetings (Nederlands)
Re: Bitcoin Meet Gent - zaterdag 1 februari vanaf 19:30
by
xa4
on 10/01/2014, 16:10:25 UTC
hehe,

Heb mij verkeerd uitgedrukt denk ik. Stel dat je online (mobiele) wallet leeg is, dan zou je bijvoorbeeld via de machine uw eigen bitcoins vanop een "bitcoinbankrekening" kunnen oververschrijven ....

Wat talent betreft, complexe regelgeving/wetgeving doorgronden is ook een talent ;-)
Maar ik denk dat er in België momenteel geen regelgeving is, dus niet veel te doorgronden is ... maar dat zal wat te simpel zijn. KYC/AML normen zijn volgens mij normen en dus geen wetgeving/regelgeving en eventueel zijn die normen niet van toepassing indien je in persoonlijke naam handelt (cfr. de geruchten dat Huobi CEO zijn persoonlijke bankrekening gebruikt) Maar ik weet er eigenlijk niets van en ben eigenlijk aan 't gissen. Weet jij welke problemen/opstakels er zijn in België mbt regelgeving/wetgeving rond Bitcoin ? 

xa4
Post
Topic
Board Meetings (Nederlands)
Re: Bitcoin Meet Gent - zaterdag 1 februari vanaf 19:30
by
xa4
on 10/01/2014, 15:27:25 UTC
Hey,
 
Kun je wat meer (technische) info geven over de machine. Ik begrijp dat je via de machine bitcoins kunt kopen; zou het bijvoorbeeld mogelijk zijn om deze machine te koppelen aan een 'trusted party', een soort bitcoinbank bijvoorbeeld, waar je een bitcoinrekening hebt en bitcoins afhaalt zoals je euros afhaalt aan een reguliere bancontact ?

Volgende meeting kom ik af (was er op de eerste meeting in november, maar laatste 2 gemist). Benieuwd naar de machine en vroeg me ook af of niemand er al aan gedacht heeft om een Belgische Exchange op poten te zetten ....cfr. bitplaats.be (onlangs in 't nieuws op coindesk). Zij hebben een spread van meer dan 10% op koop- en verkoopprijs + ze zijn duur .... dit moet met het Gentse/Belgische talent toch beter kunnen.

Cu all

xa4