In an economy hypothetically dominated by Bitcoin, its finite number (21 million) would prevent the application of traditional monetary policy tools to provide support in a downturn or reduce growth during excessive expansion.
I could say something intended to be funny like "and thank god for that!"
Really though I just want to point out that this is just yet another group of people on the fringe of understanding Bitcoin.
Recent guidance from regulators indicates growing awareness of the need for oversight:
The Internal Revenue Service has characterized Bitcoin as property rather than currency for tax purposes, effectively making each transaction a taxable event and increasing recordkeeping requirements.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) guidance obligates certain Bitcoin participants to register as money service businesses, subjecting them to greater reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Additional efforts to address consumer protection and general network safety will hopefully follow.
I didn't know Bitcoin was so complicated until I tried explaining it to people, but I'm a software developer, so go figure.
It appears the greatest problem we face if we want the world to adopt cryptocurrency is getting them to comprehend what cryptocurrency is!
Personally, I lead discussions about cryptocurrency rather than Bitcoin. As far as I'm concerned Bitcoin is the prototype to a future system (which might be Bitcoin2.0 or might be SuperMegaUltraCoin, who knows)
In a similar way, The Silk Road was an unfortunate prototype for a global online marketplace.
My question is this:
What is more important: Mass adoption of Bitcoin, OR Continued development of newer technologies? At this point, both with happen, but which is more important, which should we focus on?