Ninjastic
Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 23 results by zx9r_
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
zx9r_
on 31/05/2021, 12:24:10 UTC
Hi, It's been a while since I do not play in this site. I've been waiting for Lightning Network to be implemented to start playing here again. Do you know if it is already possible to deposit/withdraw with LN ?
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin Core 0.21.0 no incoming peers over Tor
by
zx9r_
on 15/02/2021, 01:27:39 UTC
Quote from: crypto_curious on February 14, 2021, 10:00:15 PM
Quote from: zx9r_ on February 14, 2021, 06:20:57 PM
DM your onion address and I can try to connect from my node to check if it works.
Thanks, DM sent.


I seems OK, connected to your node with no issues.

DM with the details sent.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin Core 0.21.0 no incoming peers over Tor
by
zx9r_
on 14/02/2021, 18:20:57 UTC
Quote from: crypto_curious on Today at 02:01:52 PM
My tor version:
Code:
$ tor --version
Feb 14 13:55:44.415 [warn] Tor was compiled with zstd 1.3.8, but is running with zstd 1.4.4. For safety, we'll avoid using advanced zstd functionality.
Tor version 0.4.5.5-rc.
This version of tor, from Debian buster-backports, is from Mon, 08 Feb 2021 08:12:45, that's very new - apt changelog shows:
Code:
tor (0.4.5.5-rc-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium

  * Rebuild for buster-backports.
  * Remove dh-runit build dependency and --with-runit and --with-runit for backport.

 -- Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>  Mon, 08 Feb 2021 08:12:45 +0100

libzstd versions:
Code:
$ dpkg -l | grep zstd
ii  libzstd-dev:amd64                       1.4.4+dfsg-3~bpo10+1                                             amd64        fast lossless compression algorithm -- development files
ii  libzstd1:amd64                          1.4.4+dfsg-3~bpo10+1                                             amd64        fast lossless compression algorithm
But that shouldn't be a problem, its just compression library.

I don't have any 0.21.0 peers:
Code:
bitcoin-cli getpeerinfo | grep subv
    "subver": "/Satoshi:0.20.0/",
    "subver": "/Satoshi:0.18.1/",
    "subver": "/Satoshi:0.20.1/",
    "subver": "/Satoshi:0.20.1/",
    "subver": "/Satoshi:0.20.1/",
    "subver": "/Satoshi:0.20.1/",
    "subver": "/Satoshi:0.20.1/",
    "subver": "/Satoshi:0.20.0/",
    "subver": "/Satoshi:0.20.1/",
    "subver": "/Satoshi:0.20.0/",

Also all outbound peers are Tor v2 onion hidden services, not v3, example:
Code:
2021-02-14T14:45:01Z New outbound peer connected: version: 70015, blocks=670586, peer=88, peeraddr=(16-character onion address).onion:8333 (block-relay)
No long v3 addresses have been observed, I checked all log files. My own tor hidden service works:
Code:
2021-02-14T10:49:35Z tor: Got service ID (very long onionddress), advertising service (very long onionddress).onion:8333
2021-02-14T10:49:35Z AddLocal(very (long onionddress).onion:8333,4)


Also, https://bitnodes.io/ see my node if I query my onion address on port 8333, I think that's very good. Anyway, still can't get any inbound connections.


DM your onion address and I can try to connect from my node to check if it works.

BTW, I'm upgrading my tor version as people suggested
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin Core 0.21.0 no incoming peers over Tor
by
zx9r_
on 14/02/2021, 03:33:59 UTC
Quote from: ranochigo on Today at 02:47:06 AM
That Tor version is very old, I think it's from 2018. Can you try upgrading your Tor and try again?


As far as I see I have installed the latest version:

Quote
ada@ada-VirtualBox:~/bitcoin/bin$ tor --version
Tor version 0.3.2.10 (git-0edaa32732ec8930).
ada@ada-VirtualBox:~/bitcoin/bin$ sudo apt install torbrowser-launcher
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
torbrowser-launcher is already the newest version (0.2.9-2ubuntu1).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded.

May be i'm missing something ? It is Ubuntu 18.04, not latest Ubuntu BTW
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin Core 0.21.0 no incoming peers over Tor
by
zx9r_
on 13/02/2021, 18:35:28 UTC

I upgraded to 0.21 on January 14. Tor only node. I dont get any inbound connection. Was running good on 0.20 with plenty of inbound connections.

Restarted today, catched an error message that could be the reason of this issue:


Quote
2021-02-13T15:08:33Z tor: Successfully connected!
2021-02-13T15:08:33Z tor: Connected to Tor version 0.3.2.10
2021-02-13T15:08:33Z tor: Supported authentication method: COOKIE
2021-02-13T15:08:33Z tor: Supported authentication method: HASHEDPASSWORD
2021-02-13T15:08:33Z tor: Supported authentication method: SAFECOOKIE
2021-02-13T15:08:33Z tor: Using HASHEDPASSWORD authentication
2021-02-13T15:08:33Z tor: Authentication successful
2021-02-13T15:08:33Z tor: Add onion failed; error code 513

What does that error code 513 mean ?

Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: ✅ SwC Poker ♣️ BITCOIN POKER ♣️ Hold'em✅ PLO✅ Mixed✅ MTT✅ ♣️ BBJ🌟 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆
by
zx9r_
on 21/11/2020, 20:23:25 UTC
Quote from: SkyReVo on November 10, 2020, 11:04:26 AM
https://i.imgur.com/aKJMoos.gif

Have you considered stopping this nonsense? Imagine how this looks for new players, especially when they don't even filter the games.


I totally agree. Should have only heads up tables and six max while user base is so small. Otherwise there are only empty tables and when someone wants to play doesnt finds tables with action. He quits and tables will never be started.
Post
Topic
Board Electrum
Re: Electrum Lightning Network walkthrough
by
zx9r_
on 06/07/2020, 19:30:17 UTC
Nice tutorial.

Just a typo: When you say "To create an invoice, go to 'Send', fill out 'Description' and 'Requested amount', optionally change when the invoice should expire and press 'Lightning'."

just replace "go to 'Send'" with "go to 'Receive'"
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Everything you wanted to know about Grayscale BTC Trust but were afraid to ask!
by
zx9r_
on 26/06/2020, 18:29:11 UTC
Quote from: bitcoin_paypal on Today at 01:40:23 PM
Why is this trust so popular with 50k minimum amount?

Because they are buying A LOT of BTC.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Everything you wanted to know about Grayscale BTC Trust but were afraid to ask!
by
zx9r_
on 26/06/2020, 13:01:43 UTC
Thank you for this interesting post.

Another conclusion that I get is that this is a way for the fund to aquire free BTC just printing paper (shares) with no value other for the buyer than being sold in the secondary market. At the end the fund managers get their 2% fees plus the aquired BTC out of nothing.

Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: SwC Poker RELAUNCH ♣️ BITCOIN POKER 3.0 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆 ♣ Win✅ Mac✅ Android✅ HTML5✅
by
zx9r_
on 22/02/2019, 02:48:10 UTC
How is the progress with LN integration going ? Can we expect it anytime soon ?
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: SwC Poker RELAUNCH ♣️ BITCOIN POKER 3.0 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆 ♣ Win✅ Mac✅ Android✅ HTML5✅
by
zx9r_
on 09/02/2019, 00:16:02 UTC
Quote from: SwC_Poker on February 05, 2019, 02:26:08 AM
You can see we made small increases to the rake recently, but you can also see the value of Bitcoin has fallen since 3.0 launched.


Bitcoin fluctation price should not affect to rake. Rake is paid based on a % of the pot so the price of bitcoin in $ have no relation.

If a player plays for example in limit 10/20 and bitcoin price falls to half then the same player can play in limit 20/40. Rake should not affect this.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: SwC Poker RELAUNCH ♣️ BITCOIN POKER 3.0 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆 ♣ Win✅ Mac✅ Android✅ HTML5✅
by
zx9r_
on 29/01/2019, 21:41:19 UTC
Please dont forget the LN deposits&withdrawals. Do you have an ETA for this ?
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: SwC Poker RELAUNCH ♣️ BITCOIN POKER 3.0 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆 ♣ Win✅ Mac✅ Android✅ HTML5✅
by
zx9r_
on 17/01/2019, 17:52:05 UTC
Quote from: SwC_Poker on January 15, 2019, 04:14:31 PM
Quote from: zx9r_ on January 14, 2019, 05:15:56 PM
When Lightning Network ?

I'm waiting for this to make a deposit.

Lightning network wallet function is under active development. We expect to bring this feature to the game in February.


That is excellent news. Thank you.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: SwC Poker RELAUNCH ♣️ BITCOIN POKER 3.0 ♣️ BIG BTC🏆 ♣ Win✅ Mac✅ Android✅ HTML5✅
by
zx9r_
on 14/01/2019, 17:15:56 UTC
When Lightning Network ?

I'm waiting for this to make a deposit.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: SwC Poker RELAUNCH ♣️♣️ BITCOIN POKER 3.0 ♣️♣️ Win✅ Mac✅ Android✅ HTML5✅
by
zx9r_
on 09/01/2019, 00:01:15 UTC
Is it possible to configure the software to display the stacks and pots in BB instead of chips ?
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: SwC Poker RELAUNCH ♣️♣️ BITCOIN POKER 3.0 ♣️♣️ Win✅ Mac✅ Android✅ HTML5✅
by
zx9r_
on 07/01/2019, 22:05:56 UTC
When will it be possible to deposit/withdraw with LN ?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin Core 0.16.0 Released
by
zx9r_
on 28/05/2018, 00:29:26 UTC
I have just installed bitcoind 0.16 in Linux. How can I get the seed of the HD wallet ?

I dont have nor want bitcoin-qt, only bitcoin-cli

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
by
zx9r_
on 02/03/2018, 18:13:01 UTC
Quote from: BTCWagering on March 01, 2018, 10:29:03 PM
Quote from: zx9r_ on March 01, 2018, 05:33:01 PM
12 witnesses = centralization = not good

Your reputation here is also nonexistent so I doubt anyone cares what you think.

The future decentralization of Byteball remains to be seen. It's not pretending to be anywhere near decentralized yet.

When the witnesses are run by real-world, known identities, we can speculate as to how corruptible they are, or how likely they are to collude.

Same as Ripple.



It seems you are missunderstanding the "reputation" concept with the date of my user sign up or the number of messages of this account. BTW, this is a recently created account because my original one from 2010 was hacked some months ago.

So, next time try to answer with arguments instead of using ad hominem attacks.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
by
zx9r_
on 01/03/2018, 17:33:01 UTC
Quote from: StandingTall on February 28, 2018, 07:35:38 PM
Quote from: muleroaa on February 28, 2018, 10:57:07 AM
Quote from: StandingTall on February 26, 2018, 11:43:43 PM
Andreas speaks about DAG. I think he is right that with DAG you sacrifice decentralization and coersion resistance by removing proof of work. Byteball is a good example of this. We have 12 witnesses in the hands of 1 person. And even if these 12 witnesses are 12 different people it's easy by governments to coerce them for censorship or just shut down the whole system.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfgMnbb5JeM

Could you tell some more about this? Is this from the white paper or some other source?
Yes, the white paper clearly defines 12 witnesses. These are the authority in Byteball preventing double spend that every user needs to rely on.


12 witnesses = centralization = not good
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
by
zx9r_
on 27/02/2018, 18:09:11 UTC
It is clear that Tony can manipulate the market price of byteball with his own announcements.

He can buy in the market, then announce a good new, pumping the price and then sell his byteballs just before announcing bad news, to buy again lower.

This is not serious and makes me not to believe any more in this project and so I have sold my byteballs. Not interested in beeing a holder any more.