Quote from: HashFast_CL on October 30, 2013, 01:26:43 AM

CIARA is working exclusively with HashFast. The competition will have to find another industry-leading goliath with logistic experience second to none.

I don't believe that. How is it that you got Ciara to tie their own hands and agree not to do business with any other manufacturer of crypto hardware (I'm assuming that's what you mean by "competition")? I call bullshit. If your agreement really were exclusive, there would be a statement by Ciara to that effect. I can find no such statement, and of course there was no official joint press-release.

That ridiculous "box of fans" you posted, should've gotten you guys shot by now. It's an insult to everyones' intelligence. With that, and as with so many other things, you people talk a good game, but you still lack proof. So toss it up. Prove to us that this agreement which you claim is exclusive, is indeed so. Lest you look like more of the idiot that I've previously called you out to be.

Quote from: tacotime

HashFast claims that they are at fault for the delay in the application to substrate and no other company.

Thanks for the tidbit. That's precisely why I said publicly that an engineer should have given that update, not the bumbling bobble-head marketing guy.

tacotime, you seem to be fulfilling your role quite well as a go-between and (hopefully) a community negotiating partner. Keep up the good work.

pwnyboy

Posts

Merits