Quote from: iCEBREAKER on February 08, 2015, 05:00:07 AM

I want the distribution of wealth in crypto to look like the pie chart of mining pool hashrates.

Bitcoin should be the largest, followed by many smaller ones, not a top-heavy 85%.
If 1MB starts creating problems, let the market and ecosystem deal with them for a while and see what they come up with.

Then, armed with empirical data, we can decide with higher consensus whether to change it, and by how much.

Again someone that is against raising the block size limit who wants to impose his views. So you want a distribution on wealth like a pie chart, but you also want the market and the ecosystem to deal with the problems. It can't be both ways. It's either your way or the market's way.

Quote from: Pecunia non olet on February 08, 2015, 05:17:10 AM

Go away MP!

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on February 08, 2015, 05:20:21 AM

I am an advocate of crypto in general, including Bitcoin and altcoins.

LIES! The only thing that you advocate for is failed business like HashFast. Most of your post are praising and defending a failed (scammer in my view) company that managed to eat ~50M$ while leaving most of its customers with nothing.

I know that you will say otherwise, but please prove it that you are an advocate of crypto in general. Otherwise you just eat shit just like Mircea Popescu and his sock puppets accounts.

Quote from: kazuki49 on February 08, 2015, 05:30:00 AM

Btw its pretty clear that Gavin will go ahead, there is no point in discussing this other than for some of us to come back in the future and tell I told you so.

This should be good news for everyone. I think this will be the first time where we will see how a decentralized consensus network works at stress times. Gavin may go ahead, but the network will decide. It's not called Beta for nothing! Grow up and take it like a man instead of crying like a baby. And this is for all that are against the fork. You don't like the new fork then stay on your old fork. The network will decide! Not you, not me and neither Gavin.

Quote from: amincd on February 08, 2015, 05:44:33 AM

Icebreaker wants a permanent 1 MB block size limit and for Bitcoin to lose 60% of its market share to altcoins.

Now you understand why they can't grasp the reasons for a higher block limit? They simply can't understand that a network that has a higher net-worth is much more valuable to have and will pay higher fees than a network with a lower net-worth.

What I find pretty amusing is that all the people that are against the fork want to limit something or someone with their ideas, while Gavin's idea only opens a door.