Quote from: danielpbarron on March 10, 2015, 03:44:48 PM

For point 1, they can't even get more than 10% on "version 3" which isn't even the hard-forking version. Check your debug.log for the string 'SetBestChain'.

For point 2, it may be hard, but not impossible. But it won't be an issue for long. The miners will be forced to switch back in that scenario because they will not find enough buyers on the new chain. The U.S. Government can try to prop up gavincoin for a time, but they will eventually run out of other people's money -- that is, the more they spend on electricity and gavincoin, the more they devalue the dollar. This serves to strengthen the real bitcoin. And since the fork necessarily writes free options for those of us who want to keep the old chain, we'll be shorting gavincoin on the open market while buying up the real deal. It's a win-win-win, and no matter how you look at it the fork just cannot succeed. At this point the only purpose in promoting it is to create a time-sink/distraction from more productive endeavors.

I also have the feeling that current fork proposal is born dead Wink

If not, they would push the button to fuck us, but they have to convince 80% of hashrate, so it's hard for them, and they have to ask

I fully agree that if they convince the needed hashrate, the game is not lost for Bitcoin, because MP and others will use the toys at there disposal.

On my side, I won't even try to double my coins, will just keep my coins valid in both chains, and wait until the battle is over before moving my ass Grin