Quote from: ThePhwner on September 01, 2015, 01:43:53 PM

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 01, 2015, 01:36:54 PM

Quote from: Borgminer on September 01, 2015, 01:32:54 PM

Quote from: Kenny2421 on September 01, 2015, 12:59:28 PM

Quote from: Borntostun on September 01, 2015, 12:45:30 PM

Clearly there is more than enough evidence at this point . . .

Then perhaps we should move our complaints to a more aggressive medium. If you believe that scrypt.cc should be taken down, bring your "Facts" to the FCC in the USA, or for any other country, your local communications regulators, and prove your case why it should not exist. Might not be able to get your money or santos, but at least you can go after the site.

That is if you are at all serious about "Taking them down," LOL, i have my suspicions on that topic...

~~FCC~~ YOU wont do anything, and therefore the FCC won't either...

1. The evidence has already been collected. Just because you're new here doesn't mean we all are. Go read this thread. The evidence, fact-based evidence is there. You're either too lazy to read or too stupid to know what I'm saying, I don't care which. Maybe you can prove its just laziness by reviewing the facts that have been posted here.

2. Why on Earth are you talking about the FCC? The Federal Communications Commission? This is investment fraud... which is why I mentioned the SEC.

For someone who wants to be scientific and factual and look at hard evidence, you're pretty subjective and stupid.

EDIT: and now you're resorting to the classic line of the Ponzi Queens who continue to defend their scam, "never invest more than you can afford to lose." While that's sound investment advice, it's not a defense for knowingly participating in a scam.

1. actually if you were dumb enough to invest ~7 BTC in a scam, that you already knew was suspicious, why you complaining...?

2. Yes your evidence is grand, i never post on forums though, cuz of morons who never back their statements with action. Yes, i did enjoy the piece on the potential breakdown of 850 scrypt GH, talking like it was a school class from the hood, LOL...

3. And i coulden't care less if it is invetment fraud, if you recall i said go after the site, not Santos, 'cuz Santos != Santos as far as i can tell, your claim not mine.

4. If you want Scrypt.cc to disappear then dont attack me, as im doing your thing for you since you only have a big mouth. If you won't bring legal action against the site, since the main criminal is using a False name, then at least let me do my best. your evidence is great, but if it goes unused then it is just worthless