Quote from: RealBitcoin on January 21, 2016, 01:15:32 PM

Ok folks, now I finally understood that Core is the transparent way to go and that Classic has too many shady deals and hidden motives in the background.

Now that being said, how will Core scale to the ever increasing transaction space demand?

Classic atleast has a pattern: from 2mb to 8mb to 16mb so on...

How will Core deal with this problem? The segwit stuff is only a 1 shot thing, it will increase efficiency by say 30%, and save us 30% space.

And then what? What will happen after the real block size becomes 4mb the transaction cost will increase nontheless? It will be no better than the current banking wire's and bitcoin will lose that charm, of cheap TX.

If we discover a real commerce activity, let me repeat: real commerce activity (not graphs that can be faked, or stress tests) overflowing to altcoins, then it's a valid moment to raise Bitcoin block size.

Until then, our fees gonna be cheap anyway, because you only have to pay more fee than spammers.

Since spammers are cheap asses, spammers are never going to pay a lot fees. For them it's waste of money.

Quote from: RealBitcoin on January 21, 2016, 01:15:32 PM

Question 2: What do you guys think about Roger Ver and his alliance with Classic, why is he pushing it so hard?

Simple: Ver, Toomim, Hearn, Jeff Garzik are paid by N.Y Bankers, who try to overtake Bitcoin developement. But chinese miners seem to disagree.