Quote from: augustocroppo on November 28, 2012, 09:44:22 PM

Quote from: deeplink on November 28, 2012, 09:33:09 PM

Quote from: augustocroppo on November 28, 2012, 09:23:31 PM

Observation: 'Usagi is unable to provide proper accounting.'

Again: learn to read. I didn't say usagi is unable to provide proper accounting. I said "... if usagi doesn't provide proper accounting".

Quote from: deeplink on November 28, 2012, 08:28:43 PM

Learn to read. I didn't say that it proves, but that it is reasonable to assume if usagi doesn't provide proper accounting.

The rest of your argument is unclear. Feel free to explain what your point is.

Quote from: deeplink on November 28, 2012, 09:37:30 PM

Quote from: Deprived on November 28, 2012, 09:28:04 PM

Nice strawman you made there though.

Exactly, augustocroppo, you may also want to read some more about strawman and other logical fallacies while your at it.

Still, you did not presented any evidence as I have required. I am not interested in logical fallacies.

Whatever pretension you have, your assumption does not prove that Usagi is defrauding his investors.

Usagi stated that intent himself. It wasnt like some accused him of doing it .

He said he was boxing up assets and paying out one creditor over another. Are you saying usagi was making a false statement.