we debunked your theory about processing time because any implementation can use the same libsecp256k1.
Libsecp256k1 has nothing to do with the validation time; your idiocy is astounding. Your employer will fire you if you keep being so obvious.
i said PROCESSING TIME.. you assume i meant hashing time as i can only guess thats what you meant by your.. "validation time". because maybe you dont know the difference.
by the way your allegience to blockstream is too obvious. yet i have not shown an allegience to gavin coin or toomin coin or blockstream. my personal opinion is purely on a clean coded implementation of 2mb blocks, without any corporate backers running the show. and without any crappy roadmaps that divert users away from bitcoin.. that goes for all 3 shellgames.. r3, toomin and blockstream
to me i think blockstreams early plan was to send out 2 scape-goats to make people hate them and then concede defeat to let blockstream win by default, before people notice blockstreams corporate backers.
and lastly lauda.. blocks on the majority are 900k full (only a few miners are ignorant to stay below 500k).. so knowing blocks are 900k, and knowing you have found some good news about 70million WoT gamers may start accepting bitcoin.. how are they going to transact without bottlenecks.. afterall it was you that said that there isnt a problem with full blocks yet..
when is yet?
maybe you need to learn the word BUFFER