Quote from: Richy_T on February 08, 2016, 04:03:16 AM

You are aware that the soft fork also has activation requirements, right? Good luck seeing that in "April" (Those quote marks are sarcastic by the way.)

You are aware that in a soft fork clients that do not update remain functional, while in a HF this is not true? Of course you are.

Quote from: madjules007 on February 08, 2016, 04:28:57 AM

everyone agrees that segwit adds necessary functionality, even if Classic supporters want it implemented after a hard fork. Segwit has massive support among the dev and miner communities, up to and including Classic devs. (Yes, it's a little pathetic that Toomim refuses to work on making Classic compatible and wants Core to do it for him, but that's a separate issue)

He barely knows how to apply necessary changes that Core has made. If he did, they wouldn't be going with 0.11.2.

Quote from: johnyj on February 08, 2016, 04:53:46 AM

Just heard that there is a consensus among chinese miners: They will not favor a change that moves transaction off-chain, since that will reduce their mining fee income

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." Keep trying.