Quote from: Quickseller on March 29, 2016, 06:59:09 AM

You don't think that coding a script for a ponzi is not support for a ponzi? That sounds like the definition of supporting a ponzi to me. Without the help of dooglus, any ponzi that was using the script in question would not have been able to steal money from others.

Again, I didn't code a script. I removed some code from a pre-existing script.

Any Ponzi actually using the script would have quicky realised they were paying the wrong people. It takes very little effort by anyone with familiarity of coding and Bitcoin to locate and remove the error in the script. To say that without my help no Ponzi using the script would have been able to use it to steal money is simply wrong.

Quote from: Quickseller on March 29, 2016, 06:59:09 AM

dooglus has a very long history of profiting from when other people have been scammed to the point of tens of thousands of dollars, and the amount of money stolen as a result of these scams is to the tune of millions of dollars.

Maybe you should clear this up. The way write it appears to imply that the people being scammed was somehow related to me profiting. I suspect that what you are referring to is when I played and invested at a couple of dice sites run by scammers. I was lucky not to be scammed myself by those scammers, yet you twist the reality to try to make it look as if I was somehow to blame.

Quote from: Quickseller on March 29, 2016, 06:59:09 AM

He also has a long history of hacking sites, and other transgressions that I intend on exposing, and preventing others from getting scammed similarly in the future.

More weasel words. You know how the word "hacking" has both ethical and blackhat meanings. I have never "hacked" a site in the way you are implying. I have found vulnerabilities in sites and reported them to the site owners.

Maybe you should get to exposing these "transgressions" rather than hinting at them. Let the people see that what you have amounts to a big pile of nothing.

Quote from: Quickseller on March 29, 2016, 06:59:09 AM

Quote from: MRKLYE on March 28, 2016, 09:34:02 AM

Given the fact that the clambaker site was closed only after it had fully refunded the remaining waiting payments and no one lost anything on it besides the owner paying out the remaining investments out of pocket your scam accusation and shitposting is absolutely unwarranted and frankly you have no ground to stand on with your accusation.

So do you admit that you were behind this ponzi? Or are you just speculating that no one lost any money via the clambaker ponzi?

This is the Klye that first showed me the Ponzi script he was using, yes. Are there multiple Klye's in this space?

Quote from: CryptoDatabase on March 29, 2016, 09:35:45 AM

Posting about it is worthy of a negative rating but hosting the source code is ok to do.

I have pushed a commit to my fork of the CryptoPonzi repository removing all the code and editing the README to say not to use the code.

https://github.com/dooglus/CryptoPonzi