Re: [DASH] Dash - Building the IoM | Dash Nation Progress Thread
Eventhough his posts are getting kinda repetative and desperate of nature and from time to time demonstrate a rather misinformed opinion, I think generalizethis deserves a thank you from
us morons for bumping our beloved thread so much :
us morons for bumping our beloved thread so much :
What is misinformed in this assessment? Also, am I any more repetitive than Tao's copypaste "Satoshi's dream, decentralized, we're controlling the narrative" get the noobs to these links hurry before they learn how craptacular we are speeches disguised as pleasant cheerleading?
That was quite an entertaining read actually.
By the way - math may be reliable. The technology that implements it may not be.
Also, did you just give up on trying to prove that there isn't a trustless way to verify dash's masternode distribution?
Masternodes are not distributed amongst people. There is no association between a masternode and a person any more than there is with Bitconi nodes. A person may hold a private key to a blockchain address which a masternode checks (for collateral) in order to make sure it should be running.
There is some association as far as spending a proportion of the blockchain reward though - in terms of a collateral holder being able to vote.
Masternodes are owned by people, which means the distribution of power, fees, or whatever else you morons layer on them can't be distributed in a trustlessly decentralized way, but nice attempt to muddy the waters using the same semantics that separate a premine from an instamine. So you are now admitting that ownership isn't decentralized, but you can technically claim that the masternodes are? Or am I misreading your shillspeak? I don't have trouble reading Sylvia Plath or Nietzsche, but half-truths dressed up as technical jargon are a little under my pay-grade, so maybe you could just say it like a normal person and not one trying to hide something.