Quote from: ranlo on June 27, 2016, 12:15:17 AM

Quote from: Bisquick on June 27, 2016, 12:03:09 AM

Quote from: IOTUSA on June 26, 2016, 11:59:27 PM

Quote from: Bisquick on June 26, 2016, 11:57:52 PM

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on June 26, 2016, 11:20:37 PM

I would just like to say the following:

I know a few people that are the whales in this coin (they own quite a bit over 10%+ of the coin supply). Since I am involved in a few other business deals with them, it indirectly affects my business if GBT does poorly (as they lose value on their investment). Because of this, I made the following offer to the GBT Dev team (which was rejected):

1. The MoneyPot team takes over development/hosting/marketing for Gamebet. This would be a boon for Gamebet, as MoneyPot already has over 20k registered users. MoneyPot would not only honor the obligation to all token holders, but increase profit share for token holders from 10%, to 25%.
2. Current development team gets to keep 70BTC from the dev fund. The remaining dev fund+GBT supply held by the dev team is handed over to MoneyPot to finance the continuation of this project.

Best of luck to holders of this token.

So all this time that you were spreading FUD, your plan was a hostile takeover?

I'm not sure you understand, at this point Acoin is throwing the project a lifeline since no updates other than Jadesnail has appeared. I own over 10% of all tokens, at ICO price and support Acoin since he has a proven track record and access to a network of active bettors through moneypot.

I understand that, but he has been bashing this project from the beginning, way before we knew the developers were incompetent. But, Hey, I'm all for it if it gives us a second chance at success.

If you were an actual investor, you'd have picked up on the many red flags early on. That said, the goal at this point isn't to destroy GBT, but rather create a solution that benefits its users, the owners (which are now a month into a broken project with no word as to what's even happening), and bring it back to life. The past warnings were all justified, explained, etc. But that's not the point. The past is the past. Let's look at the future.

100% agree. And if someone has doubts I will happily provide proof of my 10%+ ownership that is currently about 80% down. I am not possibly supporting a takeover for any other reason than resurrecting the value of Gamebet and our tokens. Yes, i have a relationship with Acoin from other ventures but I also have had no knowledge of any bid on Gamebet before it became publicly known.

I am of the opinion that integration with moneypot, and/or a takeover is in my best interest. The developers are welcome to state their opinion or suggest alternative options but at this point I feel that a lot of confidence is spent.