After looking more closely at that post my opinion of him is further reduced.
Care to enlighten what you see which I don't
I have no fucking idea what you have against the guy. He tried to launch a viral marketing campaign and wanted to reach a measily 500 supported. He was only able to get 30 with 142 upvotes on his first blog post about it.
Then after waiting a while and only reaching 60, he made another blog post and expressed his frustration and he also pondered if maybe Steemians have some disincentive to promote to new signups significantly.
Addressing the steemit community with "Why the Steemit Community sucks" and you can't figure out what I have against him? It is pretty obvious, he is not well suited to attracting flies with honey.
Well I've been awake 26 hours, so anything I've written in the past 6-8 hours is colored by forehead wanting to hit keyboard and just a general grrrrr reaction with running into friction in discussion when it is far exceeded my beauty sleep time.
About him not being honey (at least in his followup blog post), I understand that insurmountable scaling factors always trump any valiant attempts to select the best people for the job. So I was more interested in any insight he obtained on data, than whether he personally has a low patience. And also my patience is past my bed time.
26 hours and I was supposed to be very ill. I can't believe I am doing that. I didn't even realize I had been awake that long. I thought it was around 18.
I interpreted his title as an expression of frustration. I think smart Steemians can see they try to nurture those users which are frustrated.
Now maybe he is derelict (naive, didn't research) for thinking Steem actually had 50,000 users as many claimed. Then presumably getting frustrated thinking that not even 1% could offer supporters.