Quote from: EricCartman on March 18, 2013, 01:47:58 PM

Small thing, but on the User Stats page, the 'My Income' chart, I believe the y axis should say LTC instead of BTC, Wink

Unless you want to pay me that much BTC per day, I'm cool with that to...

I knew about this bug and forgot to mention it in beta reports, my fault as a tester.

also, ill give you my updated list, give-me-ltc.com still number one, and when stratum arrives - it would be hard to even compare to anything else.

1. give-me-ltc.com 2% and 10 confirm only no invalids , now at 98 -2 = 96% efficiency
2. coinotron.com 2% pplpns 120 confirms + some inv , now at 96 -2 = 94% efficiency
3. litecoinpool.org 5% pps no inv , now at 98 -5 = 93% efficiency
4. coinotron.com 3.5% pps + some inv , now at 95-3.5 = 91,5% efficiency

eficiency gap - p2pool shuld me somwhere in here

5.ozcoin DGM 2% + lots of invalid rejects and slowdowns of hashrate [not enough work], that bad for gpu's! around 87% efficiency
6.notroll.in 4% + lots of invalid rejects and slowdowns of hashrate [not enough work], that bad for gpu's! around 85% efficiency
7.ozcoin pps 4% + lots of invalid rejects and slowdowns of hashrate [not enough work], that bad for gpu's! around 85% efficiency
8.burnside 0% + oh s**t! stales and invalids rejects [20 - 100%] around 75% efficiency

its of course on my connection from europe, but i easlyt found many other's had similar experience.

i also experienced high rejects at LTCMine.ru , but that one i couldn't confirm that others had the same problem so i do not want to put them here before i can see I'm not the only one. LTCMine.ru is stratum-only pps with 3% and would be on place 6 after ozcoin dgm.

also tested everything in here https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/wiki/Comparison-of-mining-pools but not found anything worth mentioning.