Quote from: sorry2xs on November 24, 2016, 06:17:21 PM

Quote from: citronick on November 24, 2016, 06:08:37 PM

Quote from: IOTUSA on November 24, 2016, 05:48:55 PM

Quote from: citronick on November 24, 2016, 05:23:05 PM

Bravo Claymore!

v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!

Updates:

R9 290 = 268 H/s

R9 290x = 278 H/s

RX 480 = 172 H/s

R9 Nano = 278 H/s

R7 370 = 110 H/s

Can you provide some power consumption data for 290/290x/390? Per card or rig.

the rigs are offsite - will post when I access them tomorrow morning.

I updated remotely all the rigs that are with 1600w PSUs = 7x 370s, 5 x 390s, 6 x Nanos, and 6 x 480s.

With CDM v7.4, these rigs are mining ETH full speed, ethi 16 and nearly 80-85% of PSU.

But with CZM v7, these rigs are well under 65-70% of PSU.

Hope the CZM v8 doesnt reach CDM power draw because CZM runs with less heat and significantly lower power - and all these good points will be neutralised when CZM v8 equals CDM v7.4 powerdraw.

5x 390,5x480,2x7950s 3 psus total watts 3300 all on a single 240 volts ac circuit 12.5 amps= 3000 watts total hashrate 2.8 Kh/s Grin

3x r9 390 + 1x r9 290 = 1130w-1150w - 1120 h/s
3x r9 390 = 930w-950w - 885 h/s
3x r9 290 = 830w-850w - 725 h/s

in total 2730 h/s = 2890w - 2950w