Quote from: IOTUSA on November 24, 2016, 08:13:23 PM

Quote from: Mr047 on November 24, 2016, 07:06:47 PM

For those, who need comparison data and interested in Claymore miner progress

power of the wall
vX - version of Zcash miner
-i 6

GPU    v8    v7    v6    v5   v4   v3   v2 Power on v8

7870    115    95    65   55   40   35   32 110w
7950    190   155   125   95   70   45   38 140w
7970    200   165   120   95   65   55   48 150w
270x    115   100    67   55   40   35   32 100w
280x    200   165   125   90   65   60   51 165w
285    125   110    85   70   40   36   32 130w
RX 470 4Gb    180   155   145 120 70   60   50 120w

Got any idea how 290/290x/380/390/390x look in that table?

380 is pretty much 285 rebranding and for zec mining 470/480 is much better, I am very happy I bought RX 470 4g for ETH rigs instead of 285 Cheesy

don't have 290/390 but they do

Quote from: Assaro on November 24, 2016, 06:42:14 PM

Quote from: citronick on November 24, 2016, 05:23:05 PM

Bravo Claymore!

v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!

Updates:

R9 290 = 268 H/s

R9 290x = 278 H/s

RX 480 = 172 H/s

R9 Nano = 278 H/s

R7 370 = 110 H/s

3x r9 390 + 1x r9 290 = 1130w-1150w - 1120 h/s
3x r9 390 = 930w-950w - 885 h/s
3x r9 290 = 830w-850w - 725 h/s

in total 2730 h/s = 2890w - 2950w