Quote from: Jatnid on November 29, 2016, 08:26:23 AM

Quote from: citronick on November 29, 2016, 07:34:00 AM

Quote from: Marvell1 on November 29, 2016, 07:25:25 AM

Quote from: Hotmetal on November 29, 2016, 06:41:13 AM

Just thought I would share my benchmarking of the R9 nano.

All power measurements were done at the wall to be 100% accurate.
Benchmarks were done with Claymore ZEC - v8.0 (-i 4)

Stock:
1 gpu: ZEC: 272 h/s Watts: 200w

-100mV ROM
1 gpu: ZEC: 211 h/s Watts: 91w

-125mV ROM
1 gpu: ZEC: 217 h/s Watts: 90w

you are missing a -100 core undervolt benchmark for stock

Marvell is correct.

using AB, crank down core to -100 -mV or -96 mV, you can easily get 150watts on stock card - it's a easily forgiving card.

That is right. The memory undervolt does not make much differnce. It is 1W difference from -100mV to 125mV.

yup even more impressive you can set the power limit down around -30 and still get around 260 h/s with i-4 and watage is down to around 120-130 watts
r9 nano and fury's in general are the undisputed kings of ZEC mining. Th00ber and Other fury experts tipped me off to this.