Quote from: adaseb on January 13, 2017, 08:49:58 AM

Quote from: Bitcoins101 on January 13, 2017, 03:40:29 AM

Quote from: adaseb on January 10, 2017, 11:23:15 PM

Quote from: craked5 on January 10, 2017, 02:48:21 PM

Quote from: adaseb on January 10, 2017, 02:19:35 PM

Quote from: 1982dre on January 10, 2017, 02:15:15 PM

Quote from: lite on January 10, 2017, 02:01:21 PM

Quote from: Vongola on January 10, 2017, 02:55:47 AM

Quote from: forzendiablo on January 10, 2017, 02:48:20 AM

if i wanted to bet 50BTC primedice is the onl site i would trust at this point

Just bet your 50btc now bro! Cheesy

don't forget to share your bet on here ID when you done. Primedice won't scam your 50 btc

He wouldn't bet 50 btc all at once lol. all he's saying that he trusts primedice with 50 btc bet at current price!

Quote from: 1982dre on January 10, 2017, 06:54:05 AM

Quote from: numanoid on January 10, 2017, 05:29:47 AM

Quote from: Vongola on January 10, 2017, 02:55:47 AM

Quote from: forzendiablo on January 10, 2017, 02:48:20 AM

if i wanted to bet 50BTC primedice is the onl site i would trust at this point

Just bet your 50btc now bro! Cheesy

don't forget to share your bet on here ID when you done. Primedice won't scam your 50 btc

I doubt that he will bet 50btc in primedice, i mean, really? Risk $46500 ($910*50 btc) in a bet?
You are trust primedice but you're still wearing betcoin.ag signature? lol.

Well Max payout is 50BTC so you can't bet 50BTC. But he could try just 25BTC on 2x or just 48BTC on 98%.

A red on 98% would be sick, epic at sad at once.

As far as i know the max payout is 30 btc?

They raised the max payout a few weeks ago and it's now 50BTC. From then I haven't seen a 25BTC bet on 2x. ProGame was playing a lot 0.00499999 on 9900x but too bad he didn't hit.

I used to have many bits running on 9900x bets or so. Basically I would bet about 20000 times or so and if no winner came up I would start betting a few Sats, if after another 10000 bets I didn't hit a winner, I would increase my base price.

All was well for a few months until, I think I hit 80000 Hits or so and they were all losers and almost ended up losing all of my BTC in most of my accounts.

So yeah the 9900x isn't always gauranteed to work.

Of course it doesn't work man, that's the base of the logical fallacy "future is related to past".
There is no link between the previous bets and the future ones. As convinient as it could feel, its not because it hit red 1000 times that next time should be black. Stats are the same for the 1001 times than for the first one man.

Yes I understand however consider this scenario. Lets assume house edge is 0% for simplicity.

Say you take 100 bets, 50 are winners and 50 are losers.

Then lets say you take another 100 bets, 10 are winners, and 90 are losers.

So the house is winning and eventually sometime in the future, the stats must shift so Casino wins 50% and you win 50% of the time.

So chances are the next 100 bets, there will be more winners than losers.

I am sure there are many who make good money with similar methods as I described.

That's 100% a fallacy.

Well when you are dealing with probability you can assume that if the house wins 50% and you win 50% when rolls -> infinity. Then chances are the next 100 bets, there will be more winners than losers to even it out. Yes I understand that each roll is completely independent of the prior and the next 100 bets can also have 90% losers and 10% winners.

That's how people go bankrupt when doing martingale. However if you assume it will eventually even out then you chances of betting 100 rolls and winning 51 times or more is higher than if you made 100 bets prior and won 90% of them and lost only 10%.

Why would the previous bets affect future bets? If you do 200 bets and in the first 100 bets you have 55 winners and 45 losers, the most likely end result is 105 winners and 95 losers.