Quote from: franky1 on January 15, 2017, 07:50:07 PM

Quote from: BillyBobZorton on January 15, 2017, 07:24:35 PM

he is on record claiming its ok turning bitcoin into paypal 2.0 if that is the result of getting a blocksize thats big enough to guarantee fast cheap onchain transactions.

did you even read the article and calmly understand the context.

he said he would gladly let core have their LN (paypal2.0) if it meant core would let the community have dynamic blocks to grow bitcoins main net naturally.

meaning making LN(paypal2.0) voluntary side service bcause there would be enough room on the mainnet for both..
and not what core wants, which is
a compulsory offchain commercialised service which core want due to core restricting natural scaling of the mainnet to force people offchain.

WAKE THE HELL UP

actually understand the reality of the world.
its core that want to make the commercialised offchain permissioned service. (paypal2.0 aka LN HUBs)

Lulz, tell that when big block Roger coin will have all nodes in Jihan's data centers or with only 100 nodes around the world controlled by big business actively complying and KYC/AMLing your ass with govs because it will push out the average joe of having a node in the "Bitcoin" network.

Your big block Vision will be an epic centralized fail !

LN is decentralized and censorship resistant, the barrier to entry is so low that any idiot with low resource could run a node...

Try that with a 1 GB or worse an unlimited block buddy.

Sure you will be all on-chain, with something worse than PayPal ! Enjoy !