Quote from: notbatman on March 24, 2017, 03:08:22 PM

Quote from: BobLawblaw on March 24, 2017, 02:58:21 PM

Quote from: notbatman on March 24, 2017, 02:43:43 PM

Quote from: BobLawblaw on March 24, 2017, 01:45:57 PM

Quote from: notbatman on March 24, 2017, 12:15:55 PM

Fine details are visible on the mast, you can see a row of bolts just inches below the crosshair.

You will notice those fine details are dark, thus, correctly exposed.

You're promoting a massive fraud and you should feel bad.
http://memecrunch.com/meme/1QRS/you-are-bad-and-should-feel-bad/image.png

You are promoting a flawed and debunked theory, and should feel bad.

Saying it's debunked doesn't actually debunk the subject in question. The following image is clear enough evidence of a composite image and thus fraud that it could stand up in court.
http://i.imgur.com/lHafwPV.jpg

Again, you are mistaken.

It is not a composite image.

The outer-most glass has a cross physically etched into the lense.

It is this etching in the glass that causes bright backgrounds to over-expose the particular part of the film, giving the illusion that it is a composite image.