Quote from: iamnotback on April 15, 2017, 10:53:34 PM

Quote from: dinofelis on April 15, 2017, 03:53:04 PM

- @iamnotback is absolutely convinced that Satoshi is Nash

You continue to lie. You're a habitual liar. How many times have I written I don't think Satoshi was Nash, but I think "Nash may have been UNWITTINGLY involved".

I hope you know the definition of the word UNWITTINGLY.

I dunno.

I only remember this:

Quote from: iamnotback on April 08, 2017, 05:41:37 AM

Very strong circumstantial evidence that John Nash was Satoshi Nakamoto!

Read this!

Probably your "refutations of my technical arguments" are of the same kind Wink

"how many times have I written that I refuted your technical arguments" Wink

Remember, I'm only here to learn stuff. For myself. That's all that matters.