Quote from: Lauda on April 09, 2017, 06:36:03 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on April 09, 2017, 06:31:12 AM

Greg Maxwell on the other hand stands to profit handsomely if Bitcoin becomes a settlement layer, regardless of the damage done to Bitcoin as a result of this.

Prove it.

Blockstream, of which Maxwell is an officer of, stands to profit from Bitcoin becoming a settlement layer. Settlement layer solutions are literally Blockstream's only products.

Quote from: Lauda on April 09, 2017, 06:36:03 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on April 09, 2017, 06:31:12 AM

The financial incentives of Ver and Wu are clearly aligned with that of Bitcoin while those of Maxwell are not.

You are clearly very uninformed as to who is pulling the strings in this game. The incentives are everything but aligned with Bitcoin.

Why don't you enlighten me?

However, the sums I quoted were each of their likely current Btcoin holdings, of which would be very difficult to liquidate, even at fire sale prices. In order for either of them to realize the value of their bitcoin holdings, Bitcon's adoption needs to increase substantially.

Quote from: Lauda on April 09, 2017, 06:36:03 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on April 09, 2017, 06:31:12 AM

Greg Maxwell also has a fairly long history of dishonesty, deception and the use of sockpuppets to further his agenda.

I guess if you've ever been something 'imperfect' in your life, you are too remain so. I feel sorry for all the evil CEOs who were mischievous children. Roll Eyes

He acted this way a decade ago, he behaved this way in Bitcoin's early days, he behaved this way 4 years ago, and there is evidence to support that he is still engaging in these behaviors today.