Quote from: arthurb on May 14, 2017, 05:44:59 PM

Quote from: ohad on May 14, 2017, 04:30:19 PM

you say that turing completeness was framed. by who?

A bunch of folks as a Google Search will reveal. It's a common misconception about Rice's theorem that no programs can be analyzed.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4p0gq3/why_turingcomplete_smart_contracts_are_doomed/
https://steemit.com/thedao/@dana-edwards/turing-complete-smart-contracts-can-never-be-trustworthy
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11941758

My turn. You said I copied your writing. Show me evidence of me copying your content or retract and apologize.

i said that you presented a thesis and claimed it is wrong, on that article. you never said who came up with this thesis. like citing is not part of the story if you dont agree with the cited opinion (you didn't cite me nor anyone else and you still can't see what's wrong). was turing completeness framed by you and then un-framed by you? and the links you put are later than the article. find something that was really about the "debate spurred" you spoke about back then