Quote from: cryptodevil on May 30, 2017, 02:14:25 PM

Let's see, on the one hand we have your claim that the developer is honest, which is simply your arbitrary opinion and, on the other, we have repeated instances of dishonesty from the developer evidenced by their attempts to falsely claim legitimacy-through-association by way of registering a UK company only after having been exposed for not even being a legal entity and with false registration details, as well as falsely claiming an EV SSL being issued meant that COMODO CA had validated their company:

Quote from: cryptodev2014 on May 09, 2017, 07:21:17 AM

SECURITY & INSURANCE UPDATES

Today we have activated our EV green ssl from COMODO CA, they have validated our company CryptoDAO Limited and issued EV ssl.
This SSL also insured for upto $1,750,000 relying party warranty.
https://cryptodao.com/images/evssl.jpg

So, do tell me how you reach the conclusion that the developer is honest, especially considering that everybody behind this operation is anonymous.

He is Chinese, and he does not fully understand what he says. Cryptocurrencies is the world where is the anonymity should be respected!
Why you did not leave your negative trust to LiveCoin.net (GB off-shore), btc-e.com or Satoshi Nakamoto, etc.? Do not abuse by your trust level...

Edit. Sorry for btc-e.com, I didn't see it.. - you are hero!