Quote from: Nagadota on June 16, 2017, 04:44:46 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on June 15, 2017, 10:06:08 PM

Quote from: Nagadota on June 15, 2017, 07:46:35 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on June 15, 2017, 07:07:32 PM

Quote from: Nagadota on June 15, 2017, 06:59:47 PM

There was a lot of questioning about the "temporary" 1MB limit several years ago, but I don't know if this holds true today.

it doesn't hold true if you buy into Blockstream propaganda, I suppose.

Christ, this is boring. At least I mentioned the ViaBTC and F2Pool's polls, while you haven't mentioned any information whatsoever except for generic comments about "propaganda". I'm waiting for your response, I'm not anyone's enemy. Chill.

Bitcoin was always supposed to scale on chain with bigger blocks. Go read early satoshi writings, or my letter to the miners. It's all there.

This looks like an argument of your own rather than a reference proving that the "community has been asking for big blocks for years".

It's not there, you've argued that people used to agree with a large block size a long time ago, which is true, but you've provided no recent evidence about "the community".

Or does the "community" only consist of people you like?

Quote from: jonald_fyookball

If you don't believe me, that's fine, but there's nothing else to explain.

There is. All you need to do is answer what I actually said instead of some hypothetical statement.

Quote from: Nagadota

There was a lot of questioning about the "temporary" 1MB limit several years ago, but I don't know if this holds true today.

Can you show that it holds true today?

Even Adam Back said in 2015 we should be having bigger blocks.

"Questioning" the 1mb limit isn't the right word -- its totally clear that the limit is ludicrous. Go to r/btc , the uncensored bitcoin redit,
and you'll find nearly everyone agrees.

Stop playing dumb.