Quote from: jbreher on July 25, 2017, 02:58:59 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 25, 2017, 01:50:26 AM

Your premise about bigblockers being tricked through the segwit2x in terms of the 2x not being intended is ridiculous.

You can try to characterize this as big blockers getting 'tricked'. You're still not getting it.

It is an ongoing theme of big blockers asserting that they have been tricked - not that there is much of any basis in reality to such claims.

Quote from: jbreher on July 25, 2017, 02:58:59 AM

BCC renders any such shenanigans impotent.

Yeah more pie in the sky threats that are going to turn into a flop... time will tell, no?

Quote from: jbreher on July 25, 2017, 02:58:59 AM

Quote

Well maybe I am exaggerating a little bit to make a point about your seemingly ongoing bitterness towards Core personalities,

Exaggerating. Indeed. But what "ongoing bitterness towards Core personalities" is this of which you speak?

Does not really matter too much. I am just making an observation about an existing phenomenon... which is either ongoing bitterness towards Core personalities and/or anger and/or some other combination of other quasi-irrelevant contributory factors.

Quote from: jbreher on July 25, 2017, 02:58:59 AM

Quote

or maybe your mistaken belief that there is a large level consensus out there for bigblocks than the reality of the matter?

No. The only belief that I have about some 'large level of consensus for bigblocks' is that it is larger than one would assume if one never ventured out of the BCT.org walled garden.

you referring me to reddit r/btc? hahahahaha That's surely going to be helpful.

I also participated in bitco.in... and there is a high number of big blockers there too, tending to spew out nonsense that is based on erroneous facts erroneous logic and too much emotional baggage and irrational hatred of core personalities.

Quote from: jbreher on July 25, 2017, 02:58:59 AM

But here's the deal. I fight for what I believe to be good for Bitcoin. I'm not trying to win some popularity contest, nor be a happy lemming. I'm just energized that after years of inaction, or non-solutions being argued as the way forward, there appears on the horizon the potential of a Bitcoin drawn in the principles that I believe satoshi outlined.

You are likely in fantasy again.. sure you could join some alt coin, but it seems that the bitcoin with segwit is going to be the wave of the future, even though you have been proclaiming without really much basis in fact or logic that such a segwit bitcoin is outside of satoshi's view of bitcoin.. blah blah blah.

Quote from: jbreher on July 25, 2017, 02:58:59 AM

Quote

You certainly don't come off as a dumb person - but you just seem to be engaged in ongoing nonsense of pushing your various conclusions about the supposed preferability of big blocks - and likely you remain deluded based on getting caught up in politics and a lack of willingness to accept the core process as legit and fair.

Fair? Fair is an alien concept in a permissionless environment. Do. Or do not. There is no try.

Well there is a consensus practice that is in place for submitting BIPs... of course, the concept of a BIP in itself signifies that any good idea should be attempting to get support (consensus) if wanting it to be added to bitcoin, the mother chain.... Cheesy

Quote from: jbreher on July 25, 2017, 02:58:59 AM

(Incidentally, your labeling of it as the 'core process' (again, in a permissionless environment) belies the blinders upon your eyes)

It appears that you are attempting to get caught up in some technical weeds that strives to pervert my point(s)... .again... Roll Eyes

a past-time of ours, no?

Quote from: jbreher on July 25, 2017, 02:58:59 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 25, 2017, 02:09:55 AM

They really give a ratt's ass about supposed actual technical deficiencies in bitcoin

"There you go again."
- R. Raygun

of course some themes will have a tendency to repeat, unless the circumstances have sufficiently changed. Seems that I'm likely not wrong.