Quote from: Lauda on August 03, 2017, 11:17:13 PM

Quote from: anonjdoe on August 03, 2017, 11:13:11 PM

If SegWit is added to the legacy chain, Bitcoin Cash will be far closer to the original "Bitcoin" as laid out in the white paper. It's hardly misleading since the two issue from the same genesis block, share a transaction history, and since Bitcoin Cash changes almost no functional parameters while maintaining the project's original principles.

Neither of your sentences are a representation of the truth. Are you a supporter of this scam project BCH?

I believe my statements are true, but I suppose truth is in the eye of the beholder. I've reference my sources. Where are yours? I am indeed a supporter of the original intent of Bitcoin, which I believe is currently embodied best by Bitcoin Cash.

Quote from: Lauda on August 03, 2017, 11:17:13 PM

Quote from: anonjdoe on August 03, 2017, 11:13:11 PM

Claims that the project will lose network decentralization because of growing block chain demands that will definitely outstrip both technological progress and the increase in project support resulting from greater use, adoption and market cap is just speculation.

No. Research and common sense.

So far I can't agree with your "common sense", but I'm willing to look at this research if you'll link some.

Quote from: Lauda on August 03, 2017, 11:17:13 PM

Quote from: anonjdoe on August 03, 2017, 11:13:11 PM

Also, removing the self-imposed and unnecessary 1 MB (or ~1.7 MB in the case of SegWit) transaction limitation does not preclude second-layer scaling nor technological improvements like sharding.

If it is unnecessary, why not make the maximum block size 1 GB? Roll Eyes

Actually, since there is an existing 32 MB limitation in the variable type, I would've been fine with removing the limit altogether. When Satoshi originally added the limit, average block sizes were hundreds of (even more than a thousand) times smaller than 1 MB. A limit only 32x larger would certainly have been no problem. Also, there are built-in incentives and limitations that would prevent miners from hurting their own returns by deploying block sizes they cannot economically handle. Trust the market and the original system design if lacking hard proof that it needs to be changed.

Quote from: Lauda on August 03, 2017, 11:17:13 PM

Quote from: anonjdoe on August 03, 2017, 11:13:11 PM

Lastly, it was always the original plan to remove the temporary block size limit.

Which has no relevance to anything today.

Tl;dr: Bitcoin Cash is a scam.

Since you repeatedly fail to substantiate any of your claims, I find what you're saying has no relevance to anything today.