Quote from: Gab0 on October 05, 2017, 04:51:34 AM

Quote from: Torque on October 05, 2017, 03:42:37 AM

Quote from: notme on October 05, 2017, 03:27:02 AM

Quote from: Torque on October 05, 2017, 03:09:09 AM

Quote from: notme on October 05, 2017, 02:58:47 AM

He got lucky and made some money on the internet. Now he thinks he's a fucking genius. It's a common problem around here.

No, apparently the real geniuses are the accounts on this thread that want to convince everyone that that Bitcoin core developers are completely and woefully incompetent, that Bitcoin still sucks and if it just had bigger blocks it would take over the whole fkn world.

See BCH and their dev team for complete fail.

Why does it make you so upset that other people see the world differently than you do? If they are as wrong as you believe, you should just let time prove you right. Instead, you get your panties in a bunch whenever someone says anything you disagree with.

I have no problem at all with the exchange/sharing of ideas and non-confrontational debate. It's healthy and should be applauded.

But c'mon, this whole block size thing? FFS, it's getting really old guys. Like for years and years now has this topic been discussed and debated ad nauseam. By internet armchair warrior geniuses who have no computer programming or blockchain coding expertise, but somehow think they know better than the very people involved with the project, the Bitcoin Core dev team. The block size debate is a dead horse that has been beaten so much over the years, it's been pounded into complete dust.

And then these same people, after years and years of flooding the forums with teeth gnashing, circular and confrontational debate, FINALLY get what they want (BCH w/ 8MB block limit) and their own dev team separate from Core, and then they have the audacity to dismiss it lightly and come back and continue the debate around shoving bigger blocks into Bitcoin? Like now BCH wasn't somehow good enough, wasn't what they wanted after all? I thought that bigger blocks was the answer to all of Bitcoin's problems? Wasn't BCH supposed to solve everything?

These people aren't just debating and discussing ideas. They are trolling.

Oh! I get it; and since it was already discussed to the point of exhaustion, we'd better discuss the Las Vegas conspiracy, right?.

Out of sarcasm, there is a pink elephant in the room and you don't want to see it.
Now, more than 90% of hash power signaling part x2 of the NY agreement, and you're pretending there's nothing to discuss here?

How many of them are going to actually run the software? Is there software available yet? Oh? 90%-ish is going to signal intention to run the software until November 15 or whatever the date, and then when it comes time to run the actual software how many of them are going to run it? 90% or some other number? You think 51% will do? Or some other number? Which chain is going to be more profitable to mine, do we know that yet? Profittability will likely make a difference for a large number of miners, no?

Lot's still to happen and to find out in the coming 5-6 weeks, no?