Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Scientific proof that God exists?
by
qwik2learn
on 20/10/2017, 20:59:14 UTC

No, I'm not a scientist. If there was enough evidence then we would have a scientific theory of your beliefs, there is no survival scientific theory for magic, as far as I know, if you show it to me then I will believe you.
Consciousness is fundamental, and it influences matter.
Theories that support this idea are: Orch OR and survival.

You claim what you have is evidence but it's not, all those tests are flawed, personal experiences and can't be repeated.
Not true. Check out the tests and back up your claim with facts.

Again if there was sufficient evidence scientists would have made a scientific theory,
It already happened, I spoke with "protokol" about Orch OR and he could not deny that this theory is plausible.

you are trying to convince people that magic is real in a bitcoin forum, off topic section in a thread that is called ''scientific proof of god'' You are desperate to feel validated by others so you can still believe in what you believe.
I am pointing out that survival is a viable hypothesis and that it debunks the philosophical materialism espoused by many atheists. Parapsychological research does not qualify as "magic", the results are easily explained by scientific theories like survival and Orch OR.

Regarding TK, the evidence goes back to the 19th century, many eminent researchers have conducted their own tests:
https://www.quora.com/Is-telekinesis-scientifically-true/answers/17777933

There is a group of atheists who call themselves skeptics that display an almost religious need to deny this research. It’s just weird, but they’re very serious about it. It’s their version of religious intolerance.

Evidence doesn’t magically disappear when it’s contested. It just means that there’s disagreement.

There is plenty of evidence for psychic ability and it is a bald faced lie to say that there isn’t.