Re: hsrminer - Nvidia mining software for various algos by palgin&alexkap

Product contains devfee 1% (0.5% for me, 0.5% for alexkap) and is close-sourced, but voluntary work won't be abandoned.

Will be distributed (at least on the first stage) as one binary per algo, not so convenient, I understand, but currently it's code-bounded.

Cool work - however please consider this a formal request for the source - is seems the kernels might be related to another project of yours, https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer - which I'd also love the source for. Since the ccminer fork is entirely off a project released under GPL, all the code you've written is also considered GPL.

I'm all for your devfee and am not looking to remove it, however I tend not to run anything I cannot compile myself and I tend to try and do my own optimizations for my linux rigs.

Thanks - looking forward to the releases.

I will second this motion; ccminer is GPL and you (palgin & alexkap) no doubt have code from ccminer embedded in your code, therefore violating GPL license agreements. Doesn't matter if it's 30% or 0.03%.

I'm sorry about your financial situation (if true), but that doesn't allow you to do what you are doing here. Besides, your miner isn't any better than ccminer on neoscrypt, likely because of windows well-known DWM encumberances.

So, take me to court and prove it, man, take your destiny in your hands, become millionaire/billionaire/trillionaire (underline wanted).

First question, why do you need my source if it's not better than ccminer? What are you doing here? Oh, maybe you're GPL-police officer who decides who "no doubt" violates GPL, and who "doubtfully" violates GPL?

Second question, this one ritorical, what you consider GPL violation? For example, ccminer uses NVML wrapping, my miner uses NVML wrapping, all based on one library provided by Nvidia, code will be nearly exactly the same because it's lib provided by 3rd-party, is it GPL violation or not? If 1+1=2 why should I do 3-1=2? Or maybe you have inside info from planet Nibiru?

In UFOcoin thread:

Quote from: bluebox on December 23, 2017, 09:58:38 PM

Sorry forced dev fees and no linux binary/source, winblows only? No thanks.

Also, mr/mrs bluebox, did you know that 2017 is coming to it's end? No free phone calls for you for last couple of decades, sorry Grin

And tell me more about DWM (I didn't know that mysterious fact, thank you for mentioning), if I turn AERO interface off and DWM turns off with it, will my miner even get a chance? Or I'm doomed?
You think you're so sophisticated, exquisite, you go against the system, use only free open-source software, fight against corporations that would one day slave this World or what?