Quote from: wdmw on July 30, 2013, 04:33:25 PM

Quote from: FirstAscent on July 29, 2013, 08:56:48 PM

Quote from: wdmw on July 26, 2013, 09:07:33 PM

3. use any object not belonging to others and make it his property;

Really? You mean like wolves, riparian zones, water, old growth forests, and such?

As I've said, these fantasy documents and their authors remain woefully ignorant of such concepts as ecosystem services, ecology, and such.

As soon as you guys come up with something written by someone who actually knows stuff, I'd be interested to read it.

Is your objection to private property, or how its appropriated? Individuals have appropriated all of the things you mentioned as private property.

How about you tell me how it works with regard to the examples I gave you? That would be a first step in indicating how well thought out what you're promoting is.

Quote

This isn't a fantasy document, but a real one. How would the author's supposed ignorance of ecology affect law?

I think the very fact that you're asking that question indicates the document's shortcomings. These things cannot be written within a vacuum.

Quote

Do you think a state protects the ecosystem better?

Yes, I think their solutions are better, but not nearly as good as they could be.