Quote from: mybuddylucifer on January 28, 2018, 12:13:39 AM

Quote from: swolf on January 27, 2018, 10:44:22 PM

OH - and the wallets have not been modified - especially not the exchanges like Bill is accusing. That is false.

What was sent to the exchange?

As has been said, nothing was sent.

It was likely 51%-attacks. Most likely, the exchanges were the victims, too.

For the PAC network, the exchanges are simply another wallet clients having a lot transactions which have to be sorted out by them, including preventing the attackers from spending or running away with the "double-spent" PAC's. That's why the exchange had to put the wallets under maintenance. The exchanges with less PAC transactions should have had emerged from the maintenance mode sooner. A lot of works had to be done @every exchange. In the end, someone still has to cover the shortfall. Therefore, a lot of accusations to any entities are completely unfounded. Cheesy

Looking forward to new PAC thread.

The party is just beginning. Grin

Quote from: swolf on January 27, 2018, 10:25:41 PM

We will be starting a new Bitcointalk thread on Feb 1st for the new $PAC. Sorry I don't have time to be here regularly - we will be here more on Feb 1st. Our main support channel is Discord. There is also a helpdesk starting next in a few days as well. My inbox is unmanageable.