You'll have to be clearer as to why you're hesitant to accept the word i haven't offered.
Are you disputing the date in question? I can assure you it is correct. If you are doubting that 1994 was, indeed, at the tail end of the last century, i can confirm that also. American colloquialism for such a time-span is "more than a coon's age." That's long.
The word you've offered is that ">>it be different nao<<". You've made a statement that what was contained in the links provided by Vbs is in some way out-of-date or irrelevant.
Please explain why someone should believe your statement as you've provided no evidence to substantiate it.
I'm not saying you're wrong, btw.