Quote from: Fallenzz on February 05, 2018, 03:03:54 PM

Quote from: Hhampuz on February 05, 2018, 02:44:06 PM

Quote from: Rijakolus on February 05, 2018, 11:35:46 AM

~snip

Ofcourse you invest in something expecting an ROI, but you also have to understand when something is short term or long term. For me MGO was always a long term game as it has an extremely competent team behind it.

The two exchanges I see are HitBTC and Liqui, or are you telling me that they have no volume at all? If people are not willing to sell (Besides all the people in here "threatening" to sell all of their MGO), that can't be at the fault of the team or of the exchanges. Do you think that buy-support just magically appears out of thin air?

I don't care about your guesses regarding my position/past investments. I'll extend the same offer to you on taking all of your MGO at market value +5%. Offer only valid if you hold more than 20k MGO.

You do know why a roadmap is called a roadmap, right? They are guidelines for what is expected to happen and within what timeframe.. Honestly it sometimes feels like I have to explain things to little children who stole money from their parents and are now throwing a tantrum because they could not get a 275000% return within the first 6 months.

Regarding the funds that MGO raised, would you really prefer that a project raises money and then uses all of that money to get listed on various exchanges leaving the purse empty for more important matters? Last I heard Binance wanted around $1,000,000 to list a coin. That's no chump change.

The ico money is nowadays like 200 million no chump change either and binance listing is not 1 million dollar Wink

The roadmap and whitepaper at the time of the ico was quite clear. Marketing was stated in August and the product was almost ready. This resulted in major delays and the info on this was slim to none.
More things aren't done over time so the negative sentiment is a bit correct.

You are preaching way too positive so I know your relation to this project now. Also you gave Jack a trust score for doing a perfect ICO.
A perfect ICO hasn't people selling at a 50% loss. A perfect ICO would have made the deadlines on the roadmap. And so on.

~snip

So what is my relation to the project? IMO a perfect ICO is an ICO that delivers on the dates it has set forth, time to start it and allow people to deposit and the time from it being closed to having the tokens being sent out.. You do realize that when you buy in to any ICO you basically buy shares, and get tokens/coins whatever they offer. AFAIK MGO never promised anyone any crazy returns over the short term.

Is this the first ICO you have been a part of? Let me tell you about the story of Antshares (Now NEO) and how their ICO went.. They barely had any english communication while offering their ICO to us in the west world, they had a bunch of issues during the time of raising the funds and some weird transactions that went unexplained. Once they launched their wallet so that people could start collecting their coins it was extremely broken and barely anyone could get it to work.. This went on for a few months (yes, months) and there were numerous of instances of people investing tens of bitcoins couldn't even claim their coins.

Where are they now? Do you think I regret going through the rough looking at how it all turned out? I have about 237x more confidence in Jack and the MGO team so yeah..

Perfection is subjective, you can't tell me that I'm wrong if I believe this ICO went smooth and was indeed perfect.