Quote from: franky1 on February 21, 2018, 03:55:58 PM

ok in 3 years time from today. if you have not changed your mortgage deed into your spouses name.. the bank gets the house.. even if its fully paid for and in your name

.....

it makes you poorer and banks richer.
its not redistributing wealth to the needy..
trickle down economics does not work

so.. let you practice wat you preach today.. before trying to suggest its wat the community should be forced to do

.....

so moving coins from hoarders to mining pools wont make a blinding bit of difference to the market transparency. its just giving mining pools a free 0.1% bonus while making savers 0.1% poorer

It starts to look like you're just intentionally misunderstanding me. I said multiple time that you would send to yourself. You are in no way forced to send coins to addresses of different wallets. I myself don't mind doing that at all, otherwise I wouldn't have proposed this in the first place.

Banks? Trickle down economic? Redistributing to the needy?
What are you talking about? Who is saying any of this?

---------

As for the legitimate argument made by others.

Quote from: aardvark15 on February 21, 2018, 04:00:09 PM

I may want to set some aside in separate wallets for my children and grandchildren. These coins could sit there for 50 years before we access them. I dont want anyone taking my retirement money or the money I want to leave to my family after I die.

I admit I haven't thought about people creating multiple cold storage long term wallets for others to use in the far future that they cannot reasonably access every once in a while. However, know this is somewhat unsafe, as cryptographic methods have a tendency to break over time, by vulnerabilities being found and technological advances. It is likely you will need to migrate your wallet to eliminate a threat of theft, so keeping funds like that may not be a good idea. However, you should be free to make this decision... So ultimately I agree.