Quote from: aTriz on March 09, 2018, 02:08:19 AM

also - this was the result thing i got when i converted it

https://www.online-convert.com/result/8bfa78de-0538-4051-9d3e-7a6281b1f4f4

I obtained the exact same results from the same tool, copypasting in the script with no trailing newline:

https://www.online-convert.com/result/b805a0a1-0f53-4afc-9a4e-c197e94764d6

Quote from: online-convert.com

Your hash has been successfully generated.

Code:

hex: e9474064aaeb4d07689d80952adb4d785d318fcd43947b90ec25c12450876f50

HEX: E9474064AAEB4D07689D80952ADB4D785D318FCD43947B90EC25C12450876F50

h:e:x: e9:47:40:64:aa:eb:4d:07:68:9d:80:95:2a:db:4d:78:5d:31:8f:cd:43:94:7b:90:ec:25:c1:24:50:87:6f:50

base64: 6UdAZKrrTQdonYCVKttNeF0xj81DlHuQ7CXBJFCHb1A=

Whereas feeding (what should be) the identical preimage to Linux (GNU) sha256sum gives:

Code:

1e2a57fd0debc229f3984e625e7ea089311e779a47e3d54cf8829458190e71d2

The only difference with this is the final newlineI told you, a 1-character difference will change the whole hash:

Quote from: nullius on March 09, 2018, 02:06:36 AM

With a single '\n' on the last line, and '\n' as newline, I get sha256sum:

Code:

5d26e16eda33e8e0637bc86d0a408b7ae42f52259b346b8c142f1bee271b0fa9

(I doubt its significant as to evidence, since aTriz posted the script right on the heels of the hash; but I seek to be correct, and figure out what happened here.)

Quote from: suchmoon on March 09, 2018, 02:29:55 AM

Quote from: nullius on March 09, 2018, 02:19:46 AM

I at least expect for the Wizard of Oz to have some frighteningly impressive-looking deceptive contraption behind the curtain.

I expected there to be some... you know... CODE. For auditing and shit.

I expected there to be some... you know... MAGIC. Better than mathematical mumbo jumbo.

Quote from: suchmoon on March 09, 2018, 02:29:55 AM

Code:

currentBet *= config.loss.options.increase.value

LOL.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

Quote from: suchmoon on March 09, 2018, 02:38:45 AM

How big is your bankroll?

How many investors does Alia have?