Quote from: r3wt on September 28, 2013, 03:28:32 PM

Quote from: tspacepilot on September 28, 2013, 03:14:42 PM

Quote from: TradeFortress on September 28, 2013, 03:05:00 PM

Quote from: tspacepilot on September 28, 2013, 03:02:21 PM

Quote from: bitcoininformation on September 28, 2013, 07:11:58 AM

You don't have to sign a ToS for it to be active. Using the service means that you agree with the ToS. Damn, how can someone be so ignorant as you?
You spammed with a bot to get BTC and now TF wants it back. Sounds legit and logical to me.

My 2 cents.

So your world works like this: a faucet gives you money for watching an ad. You take the money. A few months later the faucet owner finds you on bitcointalk and says: "hey I just found out that you weren't even watching the ad, you were making sandwhiches in the kitchen when the ad was playing. This is fraud and you owe me three times the amount of money that you got from my faucet." The faucet owner lowers your bitcointalk trust and calls you a spammer. This is fair and right?

A better example would be using a python script to watch the ad 10000 times with a proxy list.

You owe me half a Bitcoin, 1.5 BTC was an estimated amount (which is not that far off when looking at how much the average user owns). I have updated the risked amount to the correct sum.

This is unhelpful and outlandish. Provide some evidence as to where you get these numbers and how they are in any way relevant to a currency trade on bitcointalk. If you assert that you 'risked .5 btc on me', what were you expecting in return? Where did I agree to this?

For pairity, Ill go ahead and arbitrarily assert that I risked 1.5 btc on you when I joined bitcointalk. If you complain, I'll lower it to the 'correct sum' of .5btc.

give it up. you botted his site, got caught and now you're mad he found you.

Ok, thanks for the feedback r3wt. I don't know if you're a moderator here. But now I understand that tradefortress and powerful people on this site can use the marketplace trust system to abuse people who they hold a grudge against for actions unrelated to bitcointalk. That is, marketplace trust and 'risked' BTC don't actually have to relate to any trade agreement on this marketplace. In fact, if what Tradefortress is doing to me is acceptable then it's clear that 'risked' BTC doesn't actually have to mean that you sent anyone that amount of BTC, just that you feel it's an amount you are owed according to reasons which you only have to justify to yourself.

According to this logic, I have now registered feedback against tradefortress that I 'risked' 0.5BTC on him. I feel justified in doing this because if I were ever to wish to trade on this site, surely my potential profits could have reached 0.5BTC were it not for the "illegal" slander which tradefortress has dragged my name into. I justify this according to my own rationale, not that I actually sent him that money or had an agreement with him for services for that money. Guess fair is fair, even if it hurts everyone in this case.