Quote from: BTCforJoe on March 22, 2018, 06:49:42 PM

Thanks to everyone for supporting this cause, and I look forward to reviewing all the posts of the Round 3 participants!

Of course, thank others, I'm saying to all the sources, if you are not up for the task to help theymos, why did you sign up for it? if you were made a source without asking, yet you would like others to point you to quality posts, maybe theymos should reconsider and rethink that you are not a good choice to be selected as a source. if they have no desire to help you, I do and I am willing to put myself under the spotlight, given the merit stats are public and any abuse could disqualify me even from posting here.

Quote from: BTCforJoe on March 22, 2018, 06:49:42 PM

Thanks for the support, guys. now lets gang bang this beggar who'd got lucky to become a source.

Yup, gang bang me. apparently I'm all alone in this and staff made a mistake to make me a source. mexxer-2 where are you man? I need more undeserved merits, these niggers are gang banging me. .

Quote from: BTCforJoe on March 22, 2018, 06:49:42 PM

This goes to show that there are, in fact, more people that understand the ideology behind this challenge.

Yes they do seem to favor laziness, find us quality posts and we'll award them merits. (my alt account joins the campaign and posts quality to get merits, account's price has increased exponentially).

Quote from: BTCforJoe on March 22, 2018, 06:49:42 PM

so I appreciate the members who have recognized the overall value in this challenge, and having a roundup to find quality posts.

That's the thing, I don't think that theymos would appreciate this. the amount of merits in this challenge is extremely insignificant compared to the overall merits generated by sources. 25 members each posting a minimum of 7 posts, 175 in total. and how many merits they can win in total?

Quote from: BTCforJoe on March 22, 2018, 06:49:42 PM

If @digaran had his way, it seems apparent that he believes that only merit sources should be allowed to merit posts, period.

Not my way, theymos has decided this, after everybody has spend their initial sMerits, only sources will remain the active spenders. but your method is wrong, you know for the fact that nobody with a high rank account enrolled in a sig campaign would ever join your challenge, they could earn way more than what you are offering. it leaves us with low ranks, you are providing a way for anybody to enrol with an alt account and post 7 high quality posts to get merits guaranteed.

Quote from: BTCforJoe on March 22, 2018, 06:49:42 PM

I find that the method in which @digaran chooses not to award merits to be much more irresponsible than my method of utilizing this challenge to identify and award merits to deserving posts.

Which method are you talking about? because I have changed my method several times to find the best one. wouldn't it be irresponsible for me to merit campaign managers or my campaign mates? you haven't even applied to be a source, yet you are speaking of responsibility, nobody has expected you to spend your merits responsibly, as you'd like to call it "your own money and merits". it would've been much more expected if you were finding and identifying meritorious posts by yourself. instead you have chosen the wrong method, that is what I'm trying to tell you.