Quote from: jamzzz123 on March 27, 2018, 08:38:05 AM

Quote from: Nathan01 on March 27, 2018, 07:59:32 AM

Quote from: Cnote328 on March 27, 2018, 05:33:24 AM

Quote from: jamzzz123 on March 26, 2018, 04:06:54 PM

Quote from: cryptossi on March 26, 2018, 03:52:23 PM

Quote from: Nathan01 on March 26, 2018, 01:59:24 PM

Quote from: Ace44 on March 26, 2018, 01:37:38 PM

Quote from: Nathan01 on March 26, 2018, 10:57:59 AM

Quote from: phantam on March 25, 2018, 09:42:08 PM

True which is why I said which exchange doesnt matter only volume matters. In the end binance or KuCoin will follo but chances are it will first need to go through the rounds on smaller exchanges like hitbtc to gain popularity and support. That will eventually lead to it growing as the platform evolves and be more and more in demand over time. Which will hopefully in the longterm lead to a big change listing

Truth is Hitbtc is not even a small exchange just not really a properly coordinated platform with a lot of complaints from most users, but like you said it's a step in the right direction, contractnet will eventually get listed in top exchanges just give it huge volume

Yes, is actually one of the top exchange sites like i stated earlier but yea, complaints surrounds it but is best they kickoff with one than pulse in the name of seeking bigger exchanges as it may lead to some sort of negative vibe

Oh yeah, i understand the point you are trying to make, everyone eventually looking out for what will serve them more, true there will be some small level of greed and bias from reviewers and like someone said here personal research is very key still no matter how credible the review may seem to be

Has the mobile dapp system been built? From the white paper it's Q1 2018 the development is going to take place if I am correct Huh

I'm not sure if that's correct, if you look at ContractNet's roadmap it says the mobile wallet will not be ready until Q3 and the DAPP browser will not be finished until Q4.

Check it out here: https://contractnet.com/roadmap/

Thanks for confirming cryptossi, the problem is with some of these new ICO's - people check out the reviews on some third party ico reviewer which often get the dates/roadmap incorrect, so thanks for confirming the roadmap and it's good to see an official website for there planned roadmap. By Q4 we should see some real progression on this one.

I don't bank on ICO review website on information about a project as this sites can easily be tempered with. ContractNet website contains all information about their entire project. Any official confirmation as to when the desktop wallet will be completely lunched?

Well i am not here to advertise any ICO review website but I think that icobench.com are doing a good job in reviewing project, you could easily verify the experts involve to prove if they are indeed authentic with their portfolio... review sites serves their purpose

I'm sure they are good genuine ICO review sites, but the point I was trying to make was that, there are many cases whereby the "Reviewer" as such wouldn't care too much about the actual review and just cares about traffic hitting there website. As said above, I'm sure there are plenty of genuine ICO reviews with great content