Quote from: amishmanish on April 27, 2018, 05:07:20 AM

Quote from: Lauda on April 24, 2018, 08:05:54 PM

Quote from: allahabadi on April 24, 2018, 07:59:51 PM

It was posted on 10th April and I believe that ALU had already placed him on temporary suspension (dunno what happened next) Huh

; but still he claimed that rewards was assessed by ALU.
-snip-

If you actually used your brain instead of concern trolling for vengeance, you'd easily notice that this is part of his thread template (under content campaign rules).

No matter how much you scream and whine[1], ALU was not/is not involved in any of this.

People insinuating against a particular feline entity that took it upon itself to be the sword of vengeance against spammers is nothing new. The same pattern repeats in this thread. "concern trolling for vengeance," is exactly what they do. Its pathetic seeing everyone trying to take a bite whenever the opportunity presents itself[1]. People suddenly change their "Joined Twitter" "Great Project" ways to become some sort of forum vigilantes. Like endlasuresh as an example.[2]

aTriz deciding to ignore the "1 BTC raised" issue with bitblisscoin represents his own dishonesty[3]. Infact, he is the one who implicated himself by accepting this in the first place. OgNasty and QS then jumped in as they couldn't let go this juicy opportunity to make Lauda and ALU look bad. They started their usual to-and-fro arguments with one insinuating and the other confirming. The pattern just can't be missed[4]...
There is some hard to follow, old feud between them with Lauda being part of some "extortion scam"; OgNasty being called out for his mismanagement of Nasty Fans; being told that he lives in a shack; QS as usual the hard to understand shadowy figure negged to max for alt-peddling and self-escrows and then OgNasty deciding to support him. It is so confusing and convoluted that you will find it hard to follow the past. Most of the level headed members side with Lauda on this and their past actions for moderating the forum too justify this choice.
[5]

Why do all the idiots and trolls who invest in ICO's in hope of flipping for gains think they can hold managers responsible for their funds??[6] In the screenshot of snakey's post above, He says "I invested 7000$ after seeing it endorsed by ALU". What kind of stupidity is this? When has ALU claimed to check the credentials of the ICO devs??[7] All they can lay claim to is that the manager won't run away with your "stakes" or "escrowed BTC" meant for bounty distributions. (Like a lot of scammy managers[8] were doing at one time).

If some idiot decides to invest 7k USD because ALU purportedly[9] supported / endorsed the ICO, then they would have invested a lot more in their earlier ICOs too. And flipped them for gains. ICO investing is a perilous thing. You gain some, you lose some. He invested because he wanted to see his money get doubled[10]. Little else.

The other purpose of this thread to get aTriz negged is fulfilled[11]. Why else is this still going on?? Lock it already[12].
But wait, Looks like there are more vultures joining in[13]. Pathetic!

Quote from: cruso on April 26, 2018, 04:34:26 PM

Lol - this inquest has shifted from Atriz to Lauda and ALU. Gripping stuff. I tried pming you bazinga442 but couldn't. Please pm me, I have something for you to chew on.

[1] Equally pathetic is the double standard expose of the individuals who want to earn a few boot-licking merits.

[2] Was that not the reason for SMAS and Tagging Spammers? Then why whine if they are turning into vigilantes; should have left them to do what they please, but then it turns onto the person waging the anti-scam/spam war. LOL.

[3] And the stupidity of those who tied up with him with and had a Holier than thou attitude and are defending him and also expecting others to let this go.

[4] Shouldn't be. The pattern is well established and clear. Chide others for their actions and neglect of rules; while let scammers run amok riding on your ass. Also ignore people when you are caught or called out.

[5] Utter non-sense; which doesn't change the fact that aTriz Scammed and is a pathetic liar; who was called out prior too; but was protected by those having vested interests.The fact that most of them who are commenitng on this thread are bounty hunters or have ascore to settle doesn't mean that Scam hasn't happened. It has and it will be called out for; as will those who turned a blind eye for far too long.

[6] They shouldn't and but going by this logic neither should the so-called scam/spam cleaners should worry if these ICOs are scammed by multi accounts. (#NotMyOpinion)

[7] Experienced and Trusted... Grin

Grandiloquence, My Foot!!!

[8] I believe lying is a scammy attribute too.

[9] aTriz specifically did and since the structure of ALU ain't clear yet; many people can assume it to be ALU. Again #NotMyOpinion.

[10] Or tripled or quadrupled... Or 100x... But should that be a reason to let BMs lie?

[11] Myopic; if that's what you think it is. It is probably the most convenient for all the guilty people associated with this act and Yes I do believe there is more to this.

[12] PIN IT!!! As good as your word. If you are fed-up, STOP WHINING and Leave...

[13] And more PIGS guarding the sty. Roll Eyes

I am not surprised, I am actually waiting and expecting more scams to fall out of the closet. Looks like a long con in play. To refresh the memory of the people here... TF was a DT-1 in theymos's Trust and he has the highest neg; won't be surprise if we see a repeat by those Holier than thou idiots on this forum...

BTW how does licking a paw taste like?

P.S. Those who find my numbering too complex for their pea-sized brain; STOP TRYING and please don't whine on this thread; go away and leave the shitposters here. Why waste your precious time if you don't care... GO; Plan a second scam...