Quote from: allahabadi on April 28, 2018, 05:26:02 PM

Quote from: Lauda on April 28, 2018, 05:22:56 PM

-snip-
bounty managers usually have nothing to do with the project
-snip-

I dunno if it entails lying on their behalf. Shocked

It does not. However, bounty managers are not responsible for validity of information provided by others nor are they obligated to constantly check information (e.g. whitepaper validity, road-map, statements in general). However, when they are made aware of a clear lie then the obvious course of action would be to pull the plug (at least make them instantly retract and apologize; which wouldn't be adequate given the scale of the lie here). I've made my disappointment with the way that this situation was handled (before, and after the exposure) clear in here. aTriz's silence is a red flag.

Quote from: allahabadi on April 28, 2018, 05:26:02 PM

I'm actually liking the way this Israel styled plausible deniability debate is ON. Cheesy

I can't cryptographically prove that I didn't know, and you can't cryptographically prove that I did know (which is what was meant with 'objective proof'). The Quickscammer style '~~friend of a friend~~ unidentified reliable source' bullshit doesn't do it for anyone with a brain bigger than 2 peanuts.

I wonder why a "pathological liar" (according to certain baboons) would make reasonable statements regarding validity of proof. Roll Eyes