Brisance, youre gaining haters! Must be doing something right. Thanks for your analysis.
Oda.krell, I think I get the gist of what youre saying but it sounds a little scatterbrain. Mind doing a tl;dr?
Then again I just got out of bed. Ill try again after a cup of coffee.
Oda.krell, I think I get the gist of what youre saying but it sounds a little scatterbrain. Mind doing a tl;dr?
Then again I just got out of bed. Ill try again after a cup of coffee.
oh, it absolutely is scatterbrained. but if you want a tl;dr...
hypothesis (not properly tested, only observed a few times in the last year):
take the
Ok, that clears up my question... (not really
) If it was indeed the median, then you are just describing a 50% fibonacci level which also happens to be the mean of 2 points anyway... Back to confusion :/
Edit:
I am guessing this should be performed on a linear chart, since a Log chart would have the 50% point (visually, anyway) off the center of the two points