Quote from: Patatas on August 10, 2018, 11:28:19 PM

Quote from: KingScorpio on August 10, 2018, 11:16:15 PM

Quote from: Patatas on August 10, 2018, 11:07:48 PM

Quote from: Newchanka on August 10, 2018, 07:14:04 PM

I agree with you. There is no doubt that the ecosystem needs objective reviews that make real difference for investors.

The only way to objectively verify/review a project is to contact their CEO and let him share his plans for the coin. I know they are busy people but giving 5 minutes out of their busy schedules to give investors an overview of their project wouldn't be impossible. That way, your website directly gets first-hand opinion from the CEO and if the CEO is ready to give such talk, there is some sort of confidence in the investors about the project's team.

well they usually run a website, like i do, and improve them to explain their message better. problem is it gets burocratic and messy to a certain degree so the ceo will have to hire public relation ship staff etc.

You don't deserve to be a CEO if you need a public relations staff to speak 100 words about your project. I mean if the CEO's of Google and Microsoft can do it, why not the ICO CEO's?

Quote from: KingScorpio on August 10, 2018, 11:16:15 PM

nevertheless we need good icos, we need good economic mangement, pow has a destructive nature and will ultimately cause a lot of poverty.

I know nothing about the latter part but I agree with you we do need a better ICO structure.

CEOs are diverse people many dont want to be very public about their work and prefer to be secretive.
keeping the entire public relation on their website. sometimes it has also secretive reasons as they might not operate ina safe region, like in the usa.